From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] efi/capsule: Add support for Quark security header Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 14:44:26 +0100 Message-ID: <20170418134426.GK24360@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <20170405092317.27921-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20170405092317.27921-9-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20170418124853.GH24360@codeblueprint.co.uk> <4daca591-8937-8256-d7f5-a1075ad7714a@siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4daca591-8937-8256-d7f5-a1075ad7714a-kv7WeFo6aLtBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Jan Kiszka Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Bryan O'Donoghue , Kweh Hock Leong , Borislav Petkov , Sascha Weisenberger List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 18 Apr, at 02:59:43PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > I've implemented this, but for the old design, and Ard took over then. > So it never made it to the list. > > Whatever layout of these bits is preferred, it can probably be done. I > just need an indication that there is (likely) a consensus. Post what you already have on top of Ard's series and we'll review it.