From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:49217 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762654AbdDSLu2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Apr 2017 07:50:28 -0400 Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 13:50:18 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Ben Hutchings Cc: stable , Thomas Gleixner , Kees Cook , John Stultz Subject: Re: [stable] Removing or restricting timer_stats Message-ID: <20170419115018.GH27378@kroah.com> References: <1492482305.2409.135.camel@decadent.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1492482305.2409.135.camel@decadent.org.uk> Sender: stable-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 03:25:05AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > The timer_stats feature was removed upstream by: > > commit dfb4357da6ddbdf57d583ba64361c9d792b0e0b1 > Author: Kees Cook > Date:���Wed Feb 8 11:26:59 2017 -0800 > > ����time: Remove CONFIG_TIMER_STATS > > I'm hesitant to propose removing a feature in stable, even if it is > redundant. What I've done for Debian stable is to restrict it to the > initial pid namespace (see attached). Would that be a reasonable > alternative change for stable branches? I don't mind removing things in stable as that's what happened in Linus's tree, and it was removed for a reason. We've done it before, and I'm more hesitant to apply something that works a bit "differently". Kees, any objection for me just taking the "full" patch in the stable kernels? thanks, greg k-h