From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/23] blktrace: remove the unused block_rq_abort tracepoint Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 17:25:58 +0200 Message-ID: <20170420152558.GA23516@lst.de> References: <20170420140316.6546-1-hch@lst.de> <20170420140316.6546-23-hch@lst.de> <20170420152056.GP13676@linux-x5ow.site> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170420152056.GP13676@linux-x5ow.site> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Thumshirn Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Josef Bacik , James Smart , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Roger Pau =?iso-8859-1?Q?Monn=E9?= , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 05:20:56PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 04:03:15PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > --- > > Just to be sure nothings forgotten, does this change need an update for > blktrace as well? I don't think so. It will just never get this event before or after this patch. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig) Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2017 17:25:58 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 22/23] blktrace: remove the unused block_rq_abort tracepoint In-Reply-To: <20170420152056.GP13676@linux-x5ow.site> References: <20170420140316.6546-1-hch@lst.de> <20170420140316.6546-23-hch@lst.de> <20170420152056.GP13676@linux-x5ow.site> Message-ID: <20170420152558.GA23516@lst.de> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017@05:20:56PM +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017@04:03:15PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig > > --- > > Just to be sure nothings forgotten, does this change need an update for > blktrace as well? I don't think so. It will just never get this event before or after this patch.