Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: fix switching to -deadline

[luca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>]

On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 10:47:29 +0100
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com> wrote:
[...]
> > > > *dl_se, update_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se);
> > > >  	else if (flags & ENQUEUE_REPLENISH)
> > > >  		replenish_dl_entity(dl_se, pi_se);
> > > > +	else if ((flags & ENQUEUE_RESTORE) &&    
> > > 
> > > Not sure I understand how this works. AFAICT we are doing
> > > __sched_setscheduler() when we want to catch the case of a new
> > > dl_entity (SCHED_{OTHER,FIFO} -> SCHED_DEADLINE}, but queue_flags
> > > (which are passed to enqueue_task()) don't seem to have
> > > ENQUEUE_RESTORE set?  
> > 
> > I was under the impression sched_setscheduler() sets
> > ENQUEUE_RESTORE... 
> 
> Oh, I think it works "by coincidence", as ENQUEUE_RESTORE ==
> DEQUEUE_SAVE == 0x02 ? :)

Not sure if this is a conincidence... By looking at the comments in
sched/sched.h I got the impression the two values match by design (and
__sched_setscheduler() is using this property to simplify the code :)



			Luca