From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 671EFE00A0A; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:50:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE, RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [209.85.223.179 listed in list.dnswl.org] * 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail provider * (twoerner[at]gmail.com) * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's * domain * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily * valid * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature * 0.5 RCVD_IN_SORBS_SPAM RBL: SORBS: sender is a spam source * [209.85.223.179 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net] Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com (mail-io0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30209E0083C for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:50:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-io0-f179.google.com with SMTP id p80so11943416iop.3 for ; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:50:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=5XA7u/jGjXfz7T6Isb8c7M1ccf/DIsAXbr9pHj/wITw=; b=eAojyCB6sYguaaYzUUnuPXqFyf4bXTcbnXm+B7XS2m7+YpoKl+cebZOQTiyqFNGGAz mxJZzNsqXWb4N1cd0Mq7zSU96PZ3EP5M+Nfv9lSl6VfT9aI2ytgzjD4r2msBE4e/tJkm /x3ebI+OpEaTSPTMATogO18bQNIYzCTFYdVxEMIREMd/5c1LuPyH0nC7c/tf072mzSRz wZ0vyAVKxCMTpVzc4QG7sPHHUb3YrlIl+UwEdmibLS8EivQGlLH3UMU8j9IdeO7UQ/Nl TVmP4mDn3l30sS3Z/YuehNOiLxjvncscIg8whvOQqzddT6UE/iZX0h04mnhOT8dNmZGd 5UMA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=5XA7u/jGjXfz7T6Isb8c7M1ccf/DIsAXbr9pHj/wITw=; b=MI31csaUV2mTtwowMu0mIiJXR8t1vdHhyvRz5d4RFaxyg9V43VTf04BDgcCUY9dIAo mEPbePvGNmFmW1LQbbiqClyRsaz7yxW+s/AeOvQ7RdbwqyPhomKiw2wP9ZQ71XJ0r5y0 Eetrsy+3ZM89Sq4aJz1YHf2yCAn7x/SqGZfDsQ8LcuiTxFCdt0+EGvjAuOhTmNzO7dSq bA97O+sDdiRZ5yyFLJQO8RJdnedGK6zSTTCoiZTXswU0j681vwdd2sr8YGnckv9C8P63 4PXVRaKvJZhHPtZ7oyX/U1yLcs5MANydl+/HR0gKW3tRo2I4t5K5D9VY+As6QDsxQGyz EoVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/77varbcWryICWO02qkQuUtc0MUiyjFiqghQxyGTHKC7RGza+WO 39nUsAeN1z/Wwg== X-Received: by 10.107.135.71 with SMTP id j68mr17145600iod.171.1492800629294; Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:50:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux-uys3 (157-52-27-174.cpe.teksavvy.com. [157.52.27.174]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c95sm941137itd.7.2017.04.21.11.50.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 21 Apr 2017 11:50:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 14:50:26 -0400 From: Trevor Woerner To: David Bensoussan Message-ID: <20170421185026.GA8444@linux-uys3> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: bitbake core-image-base -c do_populate_sdk fails with glibc (unmet dependencies) X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2017 18:50:37 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Fri 2017-04-21 @ 11:37:44 AM, David Bensoussan wrote: > I wanted to generate an sdk and met these errors while executing: > $ bitbake core-image-base -c do_populate_sdk Does adding the "do_" work? Is there any difference if you type: $ bitbake core-image-base -c populate_sdk ?