From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1955806AbdDZF5V (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 26 Apr 2017 01:57:21 -0400
Received: from mail-pf0-f179.google.com ([209.85.192.179]:33790 "EHLO
        mail-pf0-f179.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1954335AbdDZF5M (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 26 Apr 2017 01:57:12 -0400
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 14:57:03 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@gmail.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] zram: implement deduplication in zram
Message-ID: <20170426055700.GA29773@js1304-desktop>
References: <1493167946-10936-1-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
 <1493167946-10936-3-git-send-email-iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
 <20170426021452.GA673@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170426021452.GA673@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 11:14:52AM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On (04/26/17 09:52), js1304@gmail.com wrote:
> [..]
> >  	ret = scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE,
> > -			"%8llu %8llu %8llu %8lu %8ld %8llu %8lu\n",
> > +			"%8llu %8llu %8llu %8lu %8ld %8llu %8lu %8llu %8llu\n",
> >  			orig_size << PAGE_SHIFT,
> >  			(u64)atomic64_read(&zram->stats.compr_data_size),
> >  			mem_used << PAGE_SHIFT,
> >  			zram->limit_pages << PAGE_SHIFT,
> >  			max_used << PAGE_SHIFT,
> >  			(u64)atomic64_read(&zram->stats.same_pages),
> > -			pool_stats.pages_compacted);
> > +			pool_stats.pages_compacted,
> > +			zram_dedup_dup_size(zram),
> > +			zram_dedup_meta_size(zram));
> 
> hm... should't we subtract zram_dedup_dup_size(zram) from
> ->stats.compr_data_size? we don't use extra memory for dedupped
> pages. or don't inc ->stats.compr_data_size for dedupped pages?

Hmm... My intention is to keep previous stat as much as possible. User
can just notice the saving by only checking mem_used.

However, it's also odd that compr_data_size doesn't show actual
compressed data size.

Minchan, what do you think about it?

Thanks.