From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-it0-f48.google.com (mail-it0-f48.google.com [209.85.214.48]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700AC77D28 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 19:28:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-it0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 70so777702ita.0 for ; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 12:28:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=pkVGQPnIC+YE9Cks/f8EMQRHrpui0GFTUfAnOfSFBFk=; b=GeGCLVXQmiqOo6gXyy4h+nkpjqvmDb0ynX99QwPCHk56mpK2Glq2uV016g/CMMaJ2b tfv1dY6CLVLqWa2+AXrta8wLTW8fTNnKFtX/vA0XsXgevo6W0IZZuoqh9Y5olJgG7QI5 futBYGgz2DACWsEtL//jhVV/JREVF9ESoPbvq8br1sr6dH05SfpWXvuM7pTxYx045H3j qdvLWU6P1lv64YqlaAyQSJHBNHCQdPliIE1pS9eqJsntdy4uL1t01Qj7WJlNCGSz38C2 mk9C1IbzMA/9utRkFRGa1z/krqMbhKstIA/dpws9pyLmttUWhdpdkyFVhZrliVdddIVy E0vQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=pkVGQPnIC+YE9Cks/f8EMQRHrpui0GFTUfAnOfSFBFk=; b=U8C7zrubTABfrMXVFtpzfcKd4V4dooVC5gpOat+b4cnovgIPQHK79I+8aBw3V4I5my oHPEyhyJpTWAltXQJv7HBqC+4dJCKM9e03svCCEBqqhhKcA6J3hk6FlWy4P7eak+2YCV LfKzYIUHmfEuJdcN0OqwA89lYPvuek9y50uangswoxOo0wOMUC/hiOUQ5jcYTf0BREP9 cEqMppOfoJeX2DCimD4Nsavl+9dASNcf33nCMbdryu2sJRMm4WsPLeIEFolQ6aCvNSmo KIwEc0y5LAVvijulrMKVLUipDyH2jIvBW1bpAxoPe6RxyAg2j7UjE42bNeKxHWT2nU0X j6pg== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/6EsJX1/5fQYxXznyEmK8VZsj+GO8aurFzf0BfoEWYNtGNPzXxn 5UvwC6emfafv9w== X-Received: by 10.36.225.13 with SMTP id n13mr12319172ith.85.1493234899486; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 12:28:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux-uys3 ([206.248.190.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o67sm2405169ito.14.2017.04.26.12.28.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Apr 2017 12:28:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 15:28:15 -0400 From: Trevor Woerner To: "Davis, Michael" Message-ID: <20170426192815.GA2366@linux-uys3> References: <655290B7709079438B7932553958E60D16D23684@ESS-EX01.essvote.corp.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <655290B7709079438B7932553958E60D16D23684@ESS-EX01.essvote.corp.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Cc: ilkka.myller@nodefield.com, "openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org" Subject: Re: Broken NPM builds X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 19:28:19 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Wed 2017-04-26 @ 04:01:20 PM, Davis, Michael wrote: > I have a simple grunt-cli recipe using inherit npm. > On master branch it appears to be broken and unable to find the registry. Same recipe on Morty branch works fine. > I looked through the mailing list and didn't see anyone else seeing this issue. There's been quite a bit of churn on master this cycle, it's not too surprising master is struggling. Any chance you can share your recipe; or a stripped-down, "example.com" version of your recipe so others can take a look? > On a related side note I have recipes working for node 6.10.2. You have a grunt-cli recipe working on master with node 6%? > Is there a reason we are staying on the 4.x series now that 6 is LTS? I'm guessing nobody got around to noticing the switch. I guess we could cherry-pick node-6% from https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-nodejs/ Ideally we'd either merge all/most of https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-nodejs/ into oecore, or remove what's in oecore and tell people to use the external layer. Why does oe-core have some, but not all, node support?