From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 10.25.0.144 with SMTP id 138csp572914lfa; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:32:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.200.56.210 with SMTP id g18mr3012879qtc.242.1493263960354; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:32:40 -0700 (PDT) Return-Path: Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com. [66.111.4.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m63si1453848qkc.305.2017.04.26.20.32.40 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Apr 2017 20:32:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of cota@braap.org designates 66.111.4.28 as permitted sender) client-ip=66.111.4.28; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@braap.org; dkim=pass header.i=@messagingengine.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of cota@braap.org designates 66.111.4.28 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=cota@braap.org Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21E120840; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:32:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:32:39 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=braap.org; h=cc :content-type:date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=y+Qa1gZ6WZLoJ8GzmPddawm9FkZOThA7/RNwGw uY/2Q=; b=xuKOAouH19QUBMR0oNnoPK71iNKpSfaIlbbhnEjMNjMS4ZkT6Q4Tkr pkp21fxQ5AkWUqB1W14ehUTdugqljHNDUPZkeCToAOPRFwN0smcXX3sYxQ9JzLLz tkvawR+wWgFNKDbwVcLJNRkPfCUAjEp8BqkY0vzHKZADE2GuAvD9E= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=y+Qa1gZ6WZLoJ8GzmP ddawm9FkZOThA7/RNwGwuY/2Q=; b=o6ME8dIKaZe88TY77fQ3MKOb+5f1wR+wnO RoT/IYU+iSAyrX84dJnuGh73FQTjdE1pqq5vYyzaKbBWaDUSqBi0ILUaSmj+jtQ8 zFdqZexG7htoWMR83Uc5/iRns6MIx+vJnrunVGanbhTjhqtJzgVHOqqTbDhm4Kuh txmWOh0OmqwdfzWDIxMLQZ8hQIMyjeAfcrEbWTMrq90LIrGyJe7ICtslrEqeIo5H kxPjRWii/aDVREN4s09ByxtfVkboCfUSJR+W82vhF826U3EzTvdZSX/TJAR9sfpq /10xwsRTzF9CnZd/0AyE/rnymyJTP5/Jw2IhkojmDWmK4fJjP91A== X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: lU1KTM+o6M74VW8QzkkUid5GmEU24t8Wbhl6rlehm60N 1493263959 Received: from localhost (flamenco.cs.columbia.edu [128.59.20.216]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 701487E0A4; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:32:39 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:32:39 -0400 From: "Emilio G. Cota" To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Peter Crosthwaite , Richard Henderson , Peter Maydell , Eduardo Habkost , Andrzej Zaborowski , Aurelien Jarno , Alexander Graf , Stefan Weil , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org, Pranith Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/11] TCG optimizations for 2.10 Message-ID: <20170427033239.GA19380@flamenco> References: <1493263764-18657-1-git-send-email-cota@braap.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1493263764-18657-1-git-send-email-cota@braap.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-TUID: eAvgeb5+qKbi Just to avoid confusion, On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 23:29:13 -0400, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > I have *not* re-run all experiments, because it takes several hours and > performance hasn't changed much from v3, as can be seen in these two charts: > * spec06int user-mode, test input, v2.9.0 baseline: http://imgur.com/ME2eMq1 Here v4 doesn't have the htable lookup. (v4+htable has it) > * spec06int softmmu, test input, v3 baseline: http://imgur.com/Clolu9Z Here v4 does have it. E. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38662) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3aAc-0002aa-R1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:32:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d3aAc-0003gc-0c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:32:42 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2017 23:32:39 -0400 From: "Emilio G. Cota" Message-ID: <20170427033239.GA19380@flamenco> References: <1493263764-18657-1-git-send-email-cota@braap.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1493263764-18657-1-git-send-email-cota@braap.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 00/11] TCG optimizations for 2.10 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Peter Crosthwaite , Richard Henderson , Peter Maydell , Eduardo Habkost , Andrzej Zaborowski , Aurelien Jarno , Alexander Graf , Stefan Weil , qemu-arm@nongnu.org, alex.bennee@linaro.org, Pranith Kumar Just to avoid confusion, On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 23:29:13 -0400, Emilio G. Cota wrote: > I have *not* re-run all experiments, because it takes several hours and > performance hasn't changed much from v3, as can be seen in these two charts: > * spec06int user-mode, test input, v2.9.0 baseline: http://imgur.com/ME2eMq1 Here v4 doesn't have the htable lookup. (v4+htable has it) > * spec06int softmmu, test input, v3 baseline: http://imgur.com/Clolu9Z Here v4 does have it. E.