From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-io0-f179.google.com (mail-io0-f179.google.com [209.85.223.179]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350C9773C0 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:06:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-io0-f179.google.com with SMTP id r16so22104540ioi.2 for ; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 06:06:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8KIYmbY1ZFVNNXr1aP8Q69fwb8UjPqHVquw26mhciHk=; b=c/iOoUJMBQ1nGKdtpiMyL8VOwxKFH/inVlyttMJaUk3QyB2SxZKgDMf3R2i6qkOyER je4aL85ZZfZfTrIJpRLWuAIXmW1mUIhgaaNxYOcs7rIsO/3PAykkU7oeeaRBC3rqkMHp ku8IuD8POmNBmb5dU5fmauBGJuPtuaLQWFbr2S5+zV4/M06o3FJ3+oDBpP2dFhZW+Gw9 dU4IzUHyxth/eZv5Gx+vWqQxR2L02rGurO23kWsZbKuEmdyv7/bAgsW5MCldEbLf51ji bTEwC+G+zGwpAszO5j4Yh2Bhmu1Pif6HGi4TduhEzrrA75Ig53SFwW6eWwkLtFIvNvkb MGAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=8KIYmbY1ZFVNNXr1aP8Q69fwb8UjPqHVquw26mhciHk=; b=CxOwKu7DnHXLqBvfXJqBDElRz0tpEG6cbHG4PgKNmpYMP2/9XESBNBzhIvndB6mPr/ zX7c01VhKaFlnG7b3BcDP23fqV1mB2UPGN34/zpPsw5r/9tJpe8/iH7p8UbaRhv9BoZJ 6E+w7Z84PpvButXhp5jwb/u9RSDIXdSi4X/Hr1wl7DOaRPx/YRWbR5ZEn70BaAZfnbD3 FVj9wY7YLGkmCWnbD7Uwv1URvgod3VJg9tX9cQ1Nd1BKAbdeyQrBZ/8LJnAGG/0Dpsap acyongCSrb0ocowxq1Inqr18aSTG+RNxSMChw9vgefxS/6xIntZSn0gTqOKCavt81/En Oktw== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7xDuyixI9buaHQgcgypJCU34Ir23PDS/h8RykApi+kn5L2sB8E 6VnMv2qhQDtrIj9yCdg= X-Received: by 10.107.159.74 with SMTP id i71mr4513844ioe.143.1493298372983; Thu, 27 Apr 2017 06:06:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from linux-uys3 ([206.248.190.95]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v23sm1009542ioi.61.2017.04.27.06.06.11 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Apr 2017 06:06:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 09:06:09 -0400 From: Trevor Woerner To: cshored@cshore.thecshore.com Message-ID: <20170427130608.GA15538@linux-uys3> References: <093b01d2bf21$fdcb22a0$f96167e0$@cshore.thecshore.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <093b01d2bf21$fdcb22a0$f96167e0$@cshore.thecshore.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Cc: Openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: Some experimental layers and conclusions X-BeenThere: openembedded-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Using the OpenEmbedded metadata to build Distributions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2017 13:06:12 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Hi Daniel, Very interesting report, thanks for the info! On Thu 2017-04-27 @ 02:46:24 AM, cshored@cshore.thecshore.com wrote: > * OE doesn't have good *router* networking support (i.e. nothing like > OpenWrt/LEDE's netifd and friends for a headless system, that one can > configure by editing a text file, or by using a WebUI for handling multiple > interfaces and VLANs and bridged (or not) wireless and wired networks, with > easy firewall configuration). I wonder Khem's if meta-openwrt could have helped here? It looks like it has a recipe for netifd and friends: https://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/branch/master/layer/meta-openwrt/ Out of curiosity, did you try using musl? You don't mention which C library you're using. I'd be curious to know if musl can help with size reduction. Is toybox mature enough to be used in these situations? http://layers.openembedded.org/layerindex/recipe/28902/ Best regards, Trevor