All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu] Make SRCU be once again optional
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2017 17:10:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170429001040.GH3956@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.20.1704281744220.21943@knanqh.ubzr>

On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 05:51:15PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> 
> > Hello, Nicolas!
> > 
> > Saw the TTY write up LWN and figured I should send this your way.
> > It should be worth about 2K compared to current -next, which gave
> > up the 2K compared to v4.10.  So really getting things back to where
> > they were.
> > 
> > My current plan is to push this into v4.13.
> 
> Excellent!
> 
> If every maintainer finds a way to (optionally) reduce the size of the 
> code they maintain by 2K then we'll get a much smaller kernel pretty 
> soon.

I would feel better if it wasn't me who had added the 2K, but then
again, I do look forward to seeing a negative-sized kernel!  ;-)

> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 
> > commit e01ef0529ed548c1b30206058c2b5eecbbc07998
> > Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Date:   Fri Apr 28 13:53:04 2017 -0700
> > 
> >     srcu: Make SRCU be once again optional
> >     
> >     Commit d160a727c40e ("srcu: Make SRCU be built by default") in response
> >     to build errors, which were caused by code that included srcu.h
> >     despite !SRCU.  However, srcutiny.o is almost 2K of code, which is not
> >     insignificant for those attempting to run the Linux kernel on IoT devices.
> >     This commit therefore makes SRCU be once again optional, and adjusts
> >     srcu.h to allow error-free inclusion in !SRCU kernel builds.
> >     
> >     Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >     Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
> 
> Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>

Applied, thank you!

							Thanx, Paul

> > diff --git a/include/linux/srcu.h b/include/linux/srcu.h
> > index 167ad8831aaf..c0143fe2e39d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/srcu.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/srcu.h
> > @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ int init_srcu_struct(struct srcu_struct *sp);
> >  #include <linux/srcutree.h>
> >  #elif defined(CONFIG_CLASSIC_SRCU)
> >  #include <linux/srcuclassic.h>
> > -#else
> > +#elif defined(CONFIG_SRCU)
> >  #error "Unknown SRCU implementation specified to kernel configuration"
> >  #endif
> >  
> > diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig
> > index 42a346b0df43..fe72c12e06a5 100644
> > --- a/init/Kconfig
> > +++ b/init/Kconfig
> > @@ -521,7 +521,6 @@ config RCU_EXPERT
> >  
> >  config SRCU
> >  	bool
> > -	default y
> >  	help
> >  	  This option selects the sleepable version of RCU. This version
> >  	  permits arbitrary sleeping or blocking within RCU read-side critical
> > 
> > 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-29  0:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-28 21:15 [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu] Make SRCU be once again optional Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-28 21:51 ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-04-29  0:10   ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-05-12 18:41     ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-12 18:45       ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-12 18:59       ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-05-12 19:10         ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-03  3:59           ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-03  5:18             ` Nicolas Pitre
2017-06-03 20:36               ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-16 21:02                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-01-16 21:10                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-01-16 22:34                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-16 22:55                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-01-16 23:03                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-01-16 23:57                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-01-17 10:29                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-01-17 16:32                             ` Josh Triplett
2018-01-17 17:10                               ` Arnd Bergmann
2018-01-17 16:47                             ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170429001040.GH3956@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.