From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon) Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 11:21:15 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add arm@kernel.org as the list for arm64 defconfig changes In-Reply-To: <0ad7d305-d323-339f-9534-d559f1cf656a@codeaurora.org> References: <1493829085-11864-1-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org> <20170503170110.GB23620@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <95597ce9-a46f-1491-ae65-518ed8b8c44c@codeaurora.org> <4b048ba1-b7e4-6ab6-95be-3163120f63aa@codeaurora.org> <0ad7d305-d323-339f-9534-d559f1cf656a@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <20170504102114.GC5417@arm.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 12:47:16PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 05/03/2017 12:39 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > > No, I'm not saying that, and there is a better way: Send it through > > Andy if in doubt -- it should be his job as your platform maintainer > > to help guide you through the system if needed. > > Will told me that defconfig patches should go to arm at kernel.org, but you're > telling me they should go to Andy instead. defconfig patches go via arm at kernel.org, because they pick them up from the platform maintainers. However, given that the merge window is open (and my understanding is that you want these in for 4.12!), I suggested mailing them directly to arm at kernel.org to get their opinion, which they promptly provided ;) Apologies for the confusion, Will From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752368AbdEDKVW (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2017 06:21:22 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:37560 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751942AbdEDKVN (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2017 06:21:13 -0400 Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 11:21:15 +0100 From: Will Deacon To: Timur Tabi Cc: Olof Johansson , Catalin Marinas , "arm@kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Andy Gross Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: add arm@kernel.org as the list for arm64 defconfig changes Message-ID: <20170504102114.GC5417@arm.com> References: <1493829085-11864-1-git-send-email-timur@codeaurora.org> <20170503170110.GB23620@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <95597ce9-a46f-1491-ae65-518ed8b8c44c@codeaurora.org> <4b048ba1-b7e4-6ab6-95be-3163120f63aa@codeaurora.org> <0ad7d305-d323-339f-9534-d559f1cf656a@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <0ad7d305-d323-339f-9534-d559f1cf656a@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 12:47:16PM -0500, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 05/03/2017 12:39 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > > No, I'm not saying that, and there is a better way: Send it through > > Andy if in doubt -- it should be his job as your platform maintainer > > to help guide you through the system if needed. > > Will told me that defconfig patches should go to arm@kernel.org, but you're > telling me they should go to Andy instead. defconfig patches go via arm@kernel.org, because they pick them up from the platform maintainers. However, given that the merge window is open (and my understanding is that you want these in for 4.12!), I suggested mailing them directly to arm@kernel.org to get their opinion, which they promptly provided ;) Apologies for the confusion, Will