From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on dcvr.yhbt.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-ASN: AS31976 209.132.180.0/23 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=3.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RP_MATCHES_RCVD shortcircuit=no autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B71C207D6 for ; Thu, 4 May 2017 16:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754454AbdEDQhR (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2017 12:37:17 -0400 Received: from dcvr.yhbt.net ([64.71.152.64]:57350 "EHLO dcvr.yhbt.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753246AbdEDQhQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 May 2017 12:37:16 -0400 Received: from localhost (dcvr.yhbt.net [127.0.0.1]) by dcvr.yhbt.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FE72207D6; Thu, 4 May 2017 16:37:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 16:37:16 +0000 From: Eric Wong To: Ethan Clevenger Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Hiroshi Shirosaki , Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Bug? git svn tag Authentication failed Message-ID: <20170504163716.GA20370@starla> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Ethan Clevenger wrote: > Git version: 2.12.2.windows.2 > > `git svn tag 1.0` results in: Note, "git svn tag" uses the same backend code as "git svn branch", and there was a recent fix for that in commit e0688e9b28f2c5ff711460ee8b62077be5df2360 ("git svn: fix authentication with 'branch'") Looks like that change will be in 2.13 (it's in all the release-canditates), but it should backported to 2.12.x Junio: I think that commit should go into 'maint', too. Thanks. > In my .subversion directory I do have cached credentials under > auth/svn.simple. A vanilla svn CLI commit also works: > > > svn ci -m 'do creds work?' > > Adding trunk\.bar > > Transmitting file data .done > > Committing transaction... > > Committed revision 1651133. > > > Unsure if this is actually a bug or my oversight. Seems like a bug to me. Can you try one of the 2.13 release candidates to confirm? Thanks.