From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Intel Graphics Development <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
DRI Development <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] drm/vblank: Lock down vblank->hwmode more
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 14:33:58 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170508113358.GP12629@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170504131930.f47qqrwfbadsciq7@phenom.ffwll.local>
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 03:20:22PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 05:09:08PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 09:26:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > In the previous patch we've implemented hwmode tracking a la i915 for
> > > the vblank timestamp calculations. But that was just the basic
> > > semantics, i915 has some nice sanity checks to make sure we keep
> > > getting this right. Move them over too.
> > >
> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c | 8 +++++++-
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 10 ++++++----
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 11 ++---------
> > > 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > > index 89f0928b042a..942183a2aa3c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_irq.c
> > > @@ -775,8 +775,10 @@ bool drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos(struct drm_device *dev,
> > > /* If mode timing undefined, just return as no-op:
> > > * Happens during initial modesetting of a crtc.
> > > */
> > > - if (mode->crtc_clock == 0) {
> > > + if (WARN_ON(mode->crtc_clock == 0)) {
> > > DRM_DEBUG("crtc %u: Noop due to uninitialized mode.\n", pipe);
> > > + WARN_ON(drm_drv_uses_atomic_modeset(dev));
> >
> > I would make these _ONCE() otherwise the machine might end up
> > practically dead.
>
> Will do.
>
> > > +
> > > return false;
> > > }
> > >
> > > @@ -1338,6 +1340,10 @@ void drm_crtc_vblank_off(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> > > send_vblank_event(dev, e, seq, &now);
> > > }
> > > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->event_lock, irqflags);
> > > +
> > > + /* Will be reset by the modeset helpers when re-enabling the crtc by
> > > + * calling drm_calc_timestamping_constants(). */
> > > + vblank->hwmode.crtc_clock = 0;
> > > }
> > > EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_crtc_vblank_off);
> >
> > Shouldn't we do this in drm_crtc_vblank_reset() as well?
> >
> > Hmm. Except we call that after drm_calc_timestamping_constants(). I
> > guess we should be able to move the reset() into
> > intel_modeset_readout_hw_state(). And possibly move the vblank_on()
> > call as well?
>
> Yeah, it'd be nice to clean this stuff up some more, but there's also the
> problem that legacy and new drivers callc drm_calc_timestamping_constants
> at opposite ends of the modeset sequence. Doing more here is a bunch more
> work, maybe for the next patche series ...
>
> I don't think we need to call it in _reset, at least at boot-up it should
> be 0 already. And for s/r we already shut down the pipe on suspend, so
> it's gone through this here.
Hmm. Indeed that seems like it should cover it.
>
> With the _ONCE nit address (and the build breakage I've introduced in this
> version fixed), ack from you on the entire series?
Sure, for the series
Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-08 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-03 7:26 [PATCH 0/5] vblanke cleanup resend Daniel Vetter
2017-05-03 7:26 ` [PATCH 1/5] drm/vblank: Switch drm_driver->get_vblank_timestamp to return a bool Daniel Vetter
2017-05-03 7:26 ` [PATCH 2/5] drm/vblank: Switch to bool in_vblank_irq in get_vblank_timestamp Daniel Vetter
2017-05-04 10:08 ` kbuild test robot
2017-05-03 7:26 ` [PATCH 3/5] drm/vblank: Add FIXME comments about moving the vblank ts hooks Daniel Vetter
2017-05-03 7:26 ` [PATCH 4/5] drm/vblank: drop the mode argument from drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos Daniel Vetter
2017-05-03 7:26 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/vblank: Lock down vblank->hwmode more Daniel Vetter
2017-05-03 14:09 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-05-04 13:20 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-08 11:33 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2017-05-03 7:46 ` ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success for vblanke cleanup resend Patchwork
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-05-09 14:03 [PATCH 1/5] drm/vblank: Switch drm_driver->get_vblank_timestamp to return a bool Daniel Vetter
2017-05-09 14:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] drm/vblank: Lock down vblank->hwmode more Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170508113358.GP12629@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.