All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20170511081659.GA20214@lst.de>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 5bdd00e..3a6a237 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
 On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 05:00:47PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:
-> Without i_version support the file is measured/appraised once. ?With
+> Without i_version support the file is measured/appraised once. �With
 > i_version support it will be re-measured/appraised. As a file system
 > is mounted/remounted, some sort of message should be emitted
 > indicating whether i_version is supported.
 
 You can check for (sb->s_flags & MS_I_VERSION) to see if it's supported.
 
-> ?That does not imply that
+> �That does not imply that
 > there is no value in measuring/appraising the file only once.
 > 
 > With this patch, the "opt-in" behavior, is only for measurement, not
-> appraisal. ?For appraisal, it still enforces file hash/signature
+> appraisal. �For appraisal, it still enforces file hash/signature
 > verification, as it should, based on policy.
 > 
 > Christoph, could we call ->read_iter() in the NULL case as Boaz
@@ -21,7 +21,3 @@ No - that way you get deadlocks for every fs that uses i_rwsem in
 
 We can set ->integrity_read for every file system that's been tested
 with IMA, though.  Do you have a list of known-good file systems?
---
-To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
-the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
-More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index d113ada..2bef1ce 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -3,25 +3,31 @@
  "ref\0a552827e-922d-0b28-2919-90c780a8a414@plexistor.com\0"
  "ref\020170510132359.GA22549@lst.de\0"
  "ref\01494450047.3006.28.camel@linux.vnet.ibm.com\0"
- "From\0hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig)\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH] security/ima: use fs method to read integrity data\0"
+ "From\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH] security/ima: use fs method to read integrity data\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 11 May 2017 10:16:59 +0200\0"
- "To\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org\0"
+ "To\0Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>"
+  Boaz Harrosh <boaz@plexistor.com>
+  Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
+  linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
+  linux-ima-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
+ " linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Wed, May 10, 2017 at 05:00:47PM -0400, Mimi Zohar wrote:\n"
- "> Without i_version support the file is measured/appraised once. ?With\n"
+ "> Without i_version support the file is measured/appraised once. \303\257\302\277\302\275With\n"
  "> i_version support it will be re-measured/appraised. As a file system\n"
  "> is mounted/remounted, some sort of message should be emitted\n"
  "> indicating whether i_version is supported.\n"
  "\n"
  "You can check for (sb->s_flags & MS_I_VERSION) to see if it's supported.\n"
  "\n"
- "> ?That does not imply that\n"
+ "> \303\257\302\277\302\275That does not imply that\n"
  "> there is no value in measuring/appraising the file only once.\n"
  "> \n"
  "> With this patch, the \"opt-in\" behavior, is only for measurement, not\n"
- "> appraisal. ?For appraisal, it still enforces file hash/signature\n"
+ "> appraisal. \303\257\302\277\302\275For appraisal, it still enforces file hash/signature\n"
  "> verification, as it should, based on policy.\n"
  "> \n"
  "> Christoph, could we call ->read_iter() in the NULL case as Boaz\n"
@@ -31,10 +37,6 @@
  "->read_iter, which is perfectly valid behavior.\n"
  "\n"
  "We can set ->integrity_read for every file system that's been tested\n"
- "with IMA, though.  Do you have a list of known-good file systems?\n"
- "--\n"
- "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-security-module\" in\n"
- "the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n"
- More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
+ with IMA, though.  Do you have a list of known-good file systems?
 
-17839145d4a91512da993fe417a33c7822c68e40d280b5263293bb3460ffc85b
+3211d20514d7ad02163cc96be9254aafe9004e7ce9a0c028a79d7bf29cd9abb1

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.