Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: Move handling of missing page into one place in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff()

[Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>]

On Mon, May 15, 2017 at 04:44:21PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 15-05-17 09:28:37, Brian Foster wrote:
> > On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 06:50:23PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > Currently several places in xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff() handle the case
> > > of a missing page. Make them all handled in one place after the loop has
> > > terminated.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
> > > ---
> > >  fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
> > >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > index df51c025adfe..719923b99ba1 100644
> > > --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
> > > @@ -1069,10 +1069,6 @@ xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff(
> > >  				break;
> > >  
> > >  			ASSERT(type == HOLE_OFF);
> > > -			if (lastoff == startoff || lastoff < endoff) {
> > > -				found = true;
> > > -				*offset = lastoff;
> > > -			}
> > >  			break;
> > >  		}
> > >  
> > > @@ -1080,11 +1076,8 @@ xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff(
> > >  		 * At least we found one page. If the current offset is smaller
> > >  		 * than the first page offset, a hole was found.
> > >  		 */
> > > -		if (type == HOLE_OFF && lastoff < page_offset(pvec.pages[0])) {
> > > -			found = true;
> > > -			*offset = lastoff;
> > > +		if (type == HOLE_OFF && lastoff < page_offset(pvec.pages[0]))
> > >  			break;
> > > -		}
> > >  
> > >  		for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
> > >  			struct page	*page = pvec.pages[i];
> > 
> > FWIW, it looks like there's still a bug here that the first patch
> > doesn't address:
> > 
> > # xfs_io -fc "truncate 0" -c "falloc 0 32k" -c "pwrite 0 4k" -c "pwrite 32k 4k" -c "seek -h 0" /mnt/file
> > wrote 4096/4096 bytes at offset 0
> > 4 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0000 sec (126.008 MiB/sec and 32258.0645 ops/sec)
> > wrote 4096/4096 bytes at offset 32768
> > 4 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0000 sec (102.796 MiB/sec and 26315.7895 ops/sec)
> > Whence  Result
> > HOLE    36864
> > # xfs_io -c fsync -c "seek -h 0" /mnt/file 
> > Whence  Result
> > HOLE    4096
> > 
> > I initially thought this patch might fix it, but on further digging it
> > doesn't appear to. What looks like is going on here is that the
> > 'page->index > end' check doesn't actually catch this case of the page
> > being just beyond the current unwritten extent (perhaps the check should
> > be 'page->index >= end'), so lastoff is set beyond end and we skip the
> > hole.
> 
> Right, that looks like another bug in the implementation. Will you send a
> fix or should I?
> 

It'd be great if you could tack it onto this series..? Otherwise I'll
send one a bit later..

Brian

> 								Honza
> 
> 
> > 
> > Brian
> > 
> > > @@ -1150,21 +1143,20 @@ xfs_find_get_desired_pgoff(
> > >  
> > >  		/*
> > >  		 * The number of returned pages less than our desired, search
> > > -		 * done.  In this case, nothing was found for searching data,
> > > -		 * but we found a hole behind the last offset.
> > > +		 * done.
> > >  		 */
> > > -		if (nr_pages < want) {
> > > -			if (type == HOLE_OFF) {
> > > -				*offset = lastoff;
> > > -				found = true;
> > > -			}
> > > +		if (nr_pages < want)
> > >  			break;
> > > -		}
> > >  
> > >  		index = pvec.pages[i - 1]->index + 1;
> > >  		pagevec_release(&pvec);
> > >  	} while (index <= end);
> > >  
> > > +	/* No page at lastoff and we are not done - we found a hole. */
> > > +	if (type == HOLE_OFF && lastoff < endoff) {
> > > +		*offset = lastoff;
> > > +		found = true;
> > > +	}
> > >  out:
> > >  	pagevec_release(&pvec);
> > >  	return found;
> > > -- 
> > > 2.12.0
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in
> > > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> -- 
> Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
> SUSE Labs, CR