From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] virtio: Move memory_listener_unregister to .unrealize
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 20:25:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170516122528.GC27669@lemon.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e780d3d8-43f1-f46d-2858-7554a334246b@redhat.com>
On Tue, 05/16 11:23, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 16/05/2017 10:07, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Tue, 05/16 15:24, Fam Zheng wrote:
> >> The root cause of the crash is not obvious here, but the change
> >> regardlessly makes sense so it's proposed here: the listener was
> >> registered in .realize(), so do the cleanup in the matching .unrealize()
> >> rather than the .finalize() callback.
>
> This is not entirely true.
>
> Unrealize is the point where the device doesn't get any more requests.
> Instance finalize is the point where there are no references anymore.
> If a pending request has a reference to X, instance finalize is the
> right place to free X.
>
> However, in this case using .unrealize() should be fine.
>
> > Actually it seem calling memory_listener_unregister in .instance_finalize is not
> > safe because it can be in the RCU thread. This race is what caused the
> > corruption of the listener lists.
>
> RCU callbacks are called with BQL held, so that shouldn't be it. But
> the patch should be okay anyway.
You are right. Having had another look, I think it's because of this:
VirtIODevice is an embeded member of VirtIOSCSIPCI therefore it is never
"finalized" through QOM reference directly. Am I right?
Fam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-16 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-16 7:24 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] virtio: Move memory_listener_unregister to .unrealize Fam Zheng
2017-05-16 8:07 ` Fam Zheng
2017-05-16 9:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-16 12:25 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2017-05-16 12:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-17 1:55 ` Fam Zheng
2017-05-17 6:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-05-17 12:00 ` Fam Zheng
2017-05-17 12:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170516122528.GC27669@lemon.lan \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.