From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 5/7] net: don't make false software transmit timestamps
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 12:27:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170517102707.GE4156@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF=yD-+rFQBER8A=P216Bgbtxq+zHgAERoZaGdp=dvo=_otMXA@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 06:34:38PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com> wrote:
> > If software timestamping is enabled by the SO_TIMESTAMP(NS) option
> > when a message without timestamp is already waiting in the queue, the
> > __sock_recv_timestamp() function will read the current time to make a
> > timestamp in order to always have something for the application.
> >
> > However, this applies also to outgoing packets looped back to the error
> > queue when hardware timestamping is enabled by the SO_TIMESTAMPING
> > option.
>
> This is already the case for sockets that have both software receive
> timestamps and hardware tx timestamps enabled, independent from
> the new option SOF_TIMESTAMPING_OPT_TX_SWHW, right? If so,
> then this behavior must remain.
Even if we consider that it's not actually returning a valid TX
timestamp and it didn't behave as documented ("Only one field is
non-zero at any time")?
On the RX side this timestamp does make some sense as it could be
viewed as a very late timestamp, correctly ordered after the HW
timestamp, but on the TX side the order is reversed and returning a
timestamp later than the actual transmission might break a protocol.
If you don't see it as a bug fix, I think this weird interaction
between the SO_TIMESTAMPING(NS) and SO_TIMESTAMPING options needs to
be documented.
--
Miroslav Lichvar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-17 10:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-16 12:44 [PATCH v3 net-next 0/7] Extend socket timestamping API Miroslav Lichvar
2017-05-16 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 1/7] net: define receive timestamp filter for NTP Miroslav Lichvar
2017-05-16 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 2/7] net: ethernet: update drivers to handle HWTSTAMP_FILTER_NTP_ALL Miroslav Lichvar
2017-05-16 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 3/7] net: add function to retrieve original skb device using NAPI ID Miroslav Lichvar
2017-05-16 22:29 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-05-16 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 4/7] net: add new control message for incoming HW-timestamped packets Miroslav Lichvar
2017-05-16 22:29 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-05-17 14:11 ` Soheil Hassas Yeganeh
2017-05-17 17:21 ` Richard Cochran
2017-05-16 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 5/7] net: don't make false software transmit timestamps Miroslav Lichvar
2017-05-16 22:34 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-05-17 10:27 ` Miroslav Lichvar [this message]
2017-05-17 13:52 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-05-16 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 6/7] net: allow simultaneous SW and HW transmit timestamping Miroslav Lichvar
2017-05-16 22:31 ` Willem de Bruijn
2017-05-16 12:44 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 7/7] net: ethernet: update drivers to make both SW and HW TX timestamps Miroslav Lichvar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170517102707.GE4156@localhost \
--to=mlichvar@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=willemb@google.com \
--cc=willemdebruijn.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.