All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@redhat.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@redhat.com>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 18:57:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170517165756.GA19423@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALAqxLVjzOAf_UmY_5F4cYevqFD2Qa4+-uPB-2HRYNk93qvsXw@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 09:30:31AM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
> So thanks for sending these out. I still need to look them over in
> depth, but can I make another ask here?  :)
> 
> Could you submit your linux-tktest infrastructure to the kselftests dir?

I can, but it's a mess that breaks frequently as the timekeeping and
other kernel code changes. Are you sure you want that in the kernel
tree? :)

-- 
Miroslav Lichvar

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-17 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-17 16:13 [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock Miroslav Lichvar
2017-05-17 16:13 ` [PATCH RFC 1/3] timekeeping: Remove support for old vsyscalls Miroslav Lichvar
2017-05-17 16:13 ` [PATCH RFC 2/3] timekeeping: Don't align frequency adjustments to ticks Miroslav Lichvar
2017-05-17 16:13 ` [PATCH RFC 3/3] timekeeping: Determine multiplier directly from NTP tick length Miroslav Lichvar
2017-05-17 16:30 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] Improve stability of system clock John Stultz
2017-05-17 16:57   ` Miroslav Lichvar [this message]
2017-05-17 17:02     ` John Stultz
2017-05-17 17:22       ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-05-17 23:06         ` John Stultz
2017-05-18  4:54           ` Richard Cochran
2017-05-20  0:35             ` John Stultz
2017-05-21  3:19               ` Rusty Russell
2017-06-08 16:17               ` Miroslav Lichvar
2017-06-08 18:36                 ` John Stultz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170517165756.GA19423@localhost \
    --to=mlichvar@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.