From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Cc: peterx@redhat.com, marcandre.lureau@gmail.com,
vkaplans@redhat.com, jasowang@redhat.com, wexu@redhat.com,
yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
jfreiman@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] spec/vhost-user spec: Add IOMMU support
Date: Wed, 17 May 2017 19:48:01 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170517194401-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170511123246.31308-7-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 02:32:46PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> This patch specifies and implements the master/slave communication
> to support device IOTLB in slave.
>
> The vhost_iotlb_msg structure introduced for kernel backends is
> re-used, making the design close between the two backends.
>
> An exception is the use of the secondary channel to enable the
> slave to send IOTLB miss requests to the master.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
> ---
> docs/specs/vhost-user.txt | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> hw/virtio/vhost-user.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt b/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt
> index 5fa7016..4a1f0c3 100644
> --- a/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt
> +++ b/docs/specs/vhost-user.txt
> @@ -97,6 +97,23 @@ Depending on the request type, payload can be:
> log offset: offset from start of supplied file descriptor
> where logging starts (i.e. where guest address 0 would be logged)
>
> + * An IOTLB message
> + ---------------------------------------------------------
> + | iova | size | user address | permissions flags | type |
> + ---------------------------------------------------------
> +
> + IOVA: a 64-bit guest I/O virtual address
> + Size: a 64-bit size
> + User address: a 64-bit user address
> + Permissions flags: a 8-bit bit field:
> + - Bit 0: Read access
> + - Bit 1: Write access
> + Type: a 8-bit IOTLB message type:
> + - 1: IOTLB miss
> + - 2: IOTLB update
> + - 3: IOTLB invalidate
> + - 4: IOTLB access fail
> +
> In QEMU the vhost-user message is implemented with the following struct:
>
> typedef struct VhostUserMsg {
> @@ -109,6 +126,7 @@ typedef struct VhostUserMsg {
> struct vhost_vring_addr addr;
> VhostUserMemory memory;
> VhostUserLog log;
> + struct vhost_iotlb_msg iotlb;
> };
> } QEMU_PACKED VhostUserMsg;
>
> @@ -253,6 +271,31 @@ Once the source has finished migration, rings will be stopped by
> the source. No further update must be done before rings are
> restarted.
>
> +IOMMU support
> +-------------
> +
> +When the VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM feature has been negotiated, the master has
> +to send IOTLB entries update & invalidation by sending VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG
> +requests to the slave with a struct vhost_iotlb_msg payload. For update events,
> +the iotlb payload has to be filled with the update message type (2), the I/O
> +virtual address, the size, the user virtual address, and the permissions
> +flags. For invalidation events, the iotlb payload has to be filled with the
> +invalidation message type (3), the I/O virtual address and the size. On
> +success, the slave is expected to reply with a zero payload, non-zero
> +otherwise.
> +
> +When the VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_SLAVE_REQ is supported by the slave, and the
> +master initiated the slave to master communication channel using the
> +VHOST_USER_SET_SLAVE_REQ_FD request, the slave can send IOTLB miss and access
> +failure events by sending VHOST_USER_SLAVE_IOTLB_MSG requests to the master
> +with a struct vhost_iotlb_msg payload. For miss events, the iotlb payload has
> +to be filled with the miss message type (1), the I/O virtual address and the
> +permissions flags. For access failure event, the iotlb payload has to be
> +filled with the access failure message type (4), the I/O virtual address and
> +the permissions flags.
I don't think slave should cache invalid entries. If it does not,
how can it detect access failure as opposed to a miss?
> For synchronization purpose, the slave may rely on the
> +reply-ack feature, so the master may send a reply when operation is completed
What does completed mean in this context?
> +if the reply-ack feature is negotiated and slaves requests a reply.
> +
This is not very clear to me.
So slave sends an access to master. Master finds a pte that
overlaps. What does it send to guest? Initial PTE?
All PTEs to cover the request? Part of the PTE that overlaps
the request?
> Slave communication
> -------------------
>
> @@ -514,6 +557,38 @@ Master message types
> If VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK is negotiated, slave must respond
> with zero for success, non-zero otherwise.
>
> + * VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG
> +
> + Id: 22
> + Equivalent ioctl: N/A (equivalent to VHOST_IOTLB_MSG message type)
> + Master payload: struct vhost_iotlb_msg
> + Slave payload: u64
> +
> + Send IOTLB messages with struct vhost_iotlb_msg as payload.
> + Master sends such requests to update and invalidate entries in the device
> + IOTLB. The slave has to acknowledge the request with sending zero as u64
> + payload for success, non-zero otherwise.
> + This request should be send only when VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM feature
> + has been successfully negotiated.
> +
> +Slave message types
> +-------------------
> +
> + * VHOST_USER_SLAVE_IOTLB_MSG
> +
> + Id: 1
> + Equivalent ioctl: N/A (equivalent to VHOST_IOTLB_MSG message type)
> + Slave payload: struct vhost_iotlb_msg
> + Master payload: N/A
> +
> + Send IOTLB messages with struct vhost_iotlb_msg as payload.
> + Slave sends such requests to notify of an IOTLB miss, or an IOTLB
> + access failure. If VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK is negotiated,
> + and slave set the VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY flag, master must respond with
> + zero when operation is successfully completed, or non-zero otherwise.
> + This request should be send only when VIRTIO_F_IOMMU_PLATFORM feature
> + has been successfully negotiated.
> +
> VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK:
> -------------------------------
> The original vhost-user specification only demands replies for certain
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> index fbc09fa..2c93181 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user.c
> @@ -63,11 +63,13 @@ typedef enum VhostUserRequest {
> VHOST_USER_SEND_RARP = 19,
> VHOST_USER_NET_SET_MTU = 20,
> VHOST_USER_SET_SLAVE_REQ_FD = 21,
> + VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG = 22,
> VHOST_USER_MAX
> } VhostUserRequest;
>
> typedef enum VhostUserSlaveRequest {
> VHOST_USER_SLAVE_NONE = 0,
> + VHOST_USER_SLAVE_IOTLB_MSG = 1,
> VHOST_USER_SLAVE_MAX
> } VhostUserSlaveRequest;
>
> @@ -105,6 +107,7 @@ typedef struct VhostUserMsg {
> struct vhost_vring_addr addr;
> VhostUserMemory memory;
> VhostUserLog log;
> + struct vhost_iotlb_msg iotlb;
> } payload;
> } QEMU_PACKED VhostUserMsg;
>
> @@ -611,6 +614,9 @@ static void slave_read(void *opaque)
> }
>
> switch (msg.request) {
> + case VHOST_USER_SLAVE_IOTLB_MSG:
> + ret = vhost_backend_handle_iotlb_msg(dev, &msg.payload.iotlb);
> + break;
> default:
> error_report("Received unexpected msg type.");
> ret = -EINVAL;
> @@ -858,6 +864,29 @@ static int vhost_user_net_set_mtu(struct vhost_dev *dev, uint16_t mtu)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int vhost_user_send_device_iotlb_msg(struct vhost_dev *dev,
> + struct vhost_iotlb_msg *imsg)
> +{
> + VhostUserMsg msg = {
> + .request = VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG,
> + .size = sizeof(msg.payload.iotlb),
> + .flags = VHOST_USER_VERSION | VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY_MASK,
> + .payload.iotlb = *imsg,
> + };
> +
> + if (vhost_user_write(dev, &msg, NULL, 0) < 0) {
> + return -EFAULT;
> + }
> +
> + return process_message_reply(dev, msg.request);
> +}
> +
> +
> +static void vhost_user_set_iotlb_callback(struct vhost_dev *dev, int enabled)
> +{
> + /* No-op as the receive channel is not dedicated to IOTLB messages. */
> +}
> +
> const VhostOps user_ops = {
> .backend_type = VHOST_BACKEND_TYPE_USER,
> .vhost_backend_init = vhost_user_init,
> @@ -882,4 +911,6 @@ const VhostOps user_ops = {
> .vhost_migration_done = vhost_user_migration_done,
> .vhost_backend_can_merge = vhost_user_can_merge,
> .vhost_net_set_mtu = vhost_user_net_set_mtu,
> + .vhost_set_iotlb_callback = vhost_user_set_iotlb_callback,
> + .vhost_send_device_iotlb_msg = vhost_user_send_device_iotlb_msg,
> };
> --
> 2.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-17 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-11 12:32 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] vhost-user: Specify and implement device IOTLB support Maxime Coquelin
2017-05-11 12:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/6] vhost: propagate errors in vhost_device_iotlb_miss() Maxime Coquelin
2017-05-11 12:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/6] vhost: rework IOTLB messaging Maxime Coquelin
2017-05-11 12:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/6] vhost: Update rings information for IOTLB earlier Maxime Coquelin
2017-05-11 17:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-05-12 11:21 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-05-17 16:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-05-18 7:35 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-05-18 14:45 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-05-18 15:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-05-19 9:48 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-05-19 20:37 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-05-11 12:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/6] vhost-user: add vhost_user to hold the chr Maxime Coquelin
2017-05-11 12:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/6] vhost-user: add slave-req-fd support Maxime Coquelin
2017-05-11 12:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] spec/vhost-user spec: Add IOMMU support Maxime Coquelin
2017-05-11 18:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-05-12 14:21 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-05-13 0:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-05-15 5:45 ` Jason Wang
2017-05-16 15:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-05-17 2:53 ` Jason Wang
2017-05-17 14:10 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-05-19 6:48 ` Jason Wang
2017-05-19 8:35 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-05-17 15:27 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-05-16 8:19 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-05-16 13:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-05-17 16:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2017-05-18 8:43 ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-05-19 7:46 ` Jason Wang
2017-05-19 16:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2017-05-11 13:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/6] vhost-user: Specify and implement device IOTLB support no-reply
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170517194401-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=jfreiman@redhat.com \
--cc=marcandre.lureau@gmail.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=vkaplans@redhat.com \
--cc=wexu@redhat.com \
--cc=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.