From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1755638AbdESPJ0 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Fri, 19 May 2017 11:09:26 -0400
Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56854 "EHLO mx1.suse.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1755418AbdESPJX (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Fri, 19 May 2017 11:09:23 -0400
Date: Fri, 19 May 2017 17:09:20 +0200
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
        "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@linaro.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        ciaran.farrell@suse.com, christopher.denicolo@suse.com,
        fontana@sharpeleven.org, copyleft-next@lists.fedorahosted.org,
        One Thousand Gnomes <gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
        Paul Bolle <pebolle@tiscali.nl>, Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: Re: [copyleft-next] Re: Kernel modules under new copyleft licence :
 (was Re: [PATCH v2] module.h: add copyleft-next >= 0.3.1 as GPL compatible)
Message-ID: <20170519150920.GF8951@wotan.suse.de>
References: <20160809201448.GE3296@wotan.suse.de>
 <CA+55aFyhxcvD+q7tp+-yrSFDKfR0mOHgyEAe=f_94aKLsOu0Og@mail.gmail.com>
 <20170511180211.GW28800@wotan.suse.de>
 <1494861494.7848.41.camel@linux.intel.com>
 <20170516232702.GL17314@wotan.suse.de>
 <20170517165502.b6jqdcmkgz6iyau2@thunk.org>
 <20170517174128.GQ17314@wotan.suse.de>
 <20170518221205.gcfs2t4ihlpx5kj6@thunk.org>
 <20170518230442.GC8951@wotan.suse.de>
 <1495193510.7848.101.camel@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1495193510.7848.101.camel@linux.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:31:50PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > I really cannot see how you might have an attorney who wants ink on
> > 2A but not 1A.
> > I really cannot see how you might have an attorney who wants ink on
> > 2B but not 1B.
> 
> Because their job is to protect their whomsoever they represent. They
> protect them drawing upon case law and providing rules based upon
> caselaw so that people don't have to keep bothering them.
> 
> The lawyers have caselaw for "either a or b" licensing. They don't have
> caselaw for licence compatibility with your licence. Therefore it's a
> risk.

Alright, this makes sense.

As noted though there are a few "or" clauses, which upstream file
is a good template to use for copyleft-next ?

  Luis