From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751014AbdEUFfM (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 May 2017 01:35:12 -0400 Received: from mailout1.hostsharing.net ([83.223.95.204]:42929 "EHLO mailout1.hostsharing.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750803AbdEUFfL (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 May 2017 01:35:11 -0400 Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 07:35:21 +0200 From: Lukas Wunner To: "Levy, Amir (Jer)" Cc: Mika Westerberg , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andreas Noever , "Jamet, Michael" , "Bernat, Yehezkel" , Andy Lutomirski , "Mario.Limonciello@dell.com" , "Jared.Dominguez@dell.com" , Andy Shevchenko , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/24] thunderbolt: Store Thunderbolt generation in the switch structure Message-ID: <20170521053521.GB3003@wunner.de> References: <20170518143914.60902-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20170518143914.60902-19-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20170521044735.GA2948@wunner.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 05:29:47AM +0000, Levy, Amir (Jer) wrote: > On Sun, May 21 2017, 07:47 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 05:39:08PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > + > > > + default: > > > + sw->generation = 1; > > > + break; > > > > If someone adds an entry for, say, a new TB3 controller to nhi_ids[] but > > forgets to update this function, the controller is assigned the wrong > > generation number. It might be better to make TB3 the default and list > > each TB1 controller instead since it's less likely for Intel to introduce > > an older gen chip. > > > > Generally I think it's problematic to require that multiple files are > > touched whenever a new controller is added. Isn't the generation number > > or link speed (10/20/40) stored in some register in PCI config space > > (VSEC 0x1234) or TB config space? > > How about setting information, that isn't available from PCI, in > pci_device_id.driver_data when initializing nhi_ids[]? Right, that would also be possible, though reading the generation number from a register would be more elegant, if such a register exists. Thanks, Lukas