From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751315AbdEUHks (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 May 2017 03:40:48 -0400 Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:17300 "EHLO mga02.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750786AbdEUHkr (ORCPT ); Sun, 21 May 2017 03:40:47 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,373,1491289200"; d="scan'208";a="264533875" Date: Sun, 21 May 2017 10:40:41 +0300 From: Mika Westerberg To: Lukas Wunner Cc: "Levy, Amir (Jer)" , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Andreas Noever , "Jamet, Michael" , "Bernat, Yehezkel" , Andy Lutomirski , "Mario.Limonciello@dell.com" , "Jared.Dominguez@dell.com" , Andy Shevchenko , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/24] thunderbolt: Store Thunderbolt generation in the switch structure Message-ID: <20170521074041.GK8541@lahna.fi.intel.com> References: <20170518143914.60902-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20170518143914.60902-19-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> <20170521044735.GA2948@wunner.de> <20170521053521.GB3003@wunner.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170521053521.GB3003@wunner.de> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 07:35:21AM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 05:29:47AM +0000, Levy, Amir (Jer) wrote: > > On Sun, May 21 2017, 07:47 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 05:39:08PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > + > > > > + default: > > > > + sw->generation = 1; > > > > + break; > > > > > > If someone adds an entry for, say, a new TB3 controller to nhi_ids[] but > > > forgets to update this function, the controller is assigned the wrong > > > generation number. It might be better to make TB3 the default and list > > > each TB1 controller instead since it's less likely for Intel to introduce > > > an older gen chip. > > > > > > Generally I think it's problematic to require that multiple files are > > > touched whenever a new controller is added. Isn't the generation number > > > or link speed (10/20/40) stored in some register in PCI config space > > > (VSEC 0x1234) or TB config space? > > > > How about setting information, that isn't available from PCI, in > > pci_device_id.driver_data when initializing nhi_ids[]? > > Right, that would also be possible, though reading the generation number > from a register would be more elegant, if such a register exists. I don't think there is such register but I can put this information to the driver_data instead.