All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	Laurent Vivier <lvivier@redhat.com>,
	Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Cedric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] target/ppc: consolidate CPU device-tree id computation in helper
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 16:33:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170522163336.3ace23ab@bahia.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170522021246.GG30246@umbus.fritz.box>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 6123 bytes --]

On Mon, 22 May 2017 12:12:46 +1000
David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote:

> On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 12:04:13PM +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 12:32:20PM +0200, Greg Kurz wrote:  
> > > For historical reasons, we compute CPU device-tree ids with a non-trivial
> > > logic. This patch consolidate the logic in a single helper to be used
> > > in various places where it is currently open-coded.
> > > 
> > > It is okay to get rid of DIV_ROUND_UP() because we're sure that the number
> > > of threads per core in the guest cannot exceed the number of threads per
> > > core in the host.  
> > 
> > However, your new logic still gives different answers in some cases.
> > In particular when max_cpus is not a multiple of smp_threads.  Which
> > is generally a bad idea, but allowed for older machine types for
> > compatibility.   e.g. smp_threads=4, max_cpus=6 smt=8
> > 
> > Old logic:
> > 	         DIV_ROUND_UP(6 * 8, 4)
> > 	       = ⌈48 / 4⌉ = 12
> > 
> > New logic gives: ⌊6 / 4⌋ * 8 + (6 % 4)
> >                = 1 * 8 + 2
> > 	       = 10
> > 
> > In any case the DIV_ROUND_UP() isn't to handle the case where guest
> > threads-per-core is bigger than host threads-per-core, it's (IIRC) for
> > the case where guest threads-per-core is not a factor of host
> > threads-per-core.  Again, a bad idea, but I think allowed in some old
> > cases.  
> 
> Oh, so, the other more general point here is that I actually want to
> get rid of dt_id from the cpu structure.  It's basically an abuse of
> the cpu stuff to include what's really an spapr concept - dt IDs for
> powernv are based on the PIR and not allocate the same way.
> 

Yeah, I agree. I guess this calls for the introduction of a sPAPRCPUThread
object type derived from PowerPCCPU. It probably deserves to be addressed
in a separate patchset.

> That said, I'm still ok with a fixed version of this patch as an
> interim step.
> 

Given that the logic change doesn't break anything in the end (see my other
mail), then we're good ?

> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
> > > ---
> > >  hw/ppc/spapr.c              |    6 ++----
> > >  target/ppc/cpu.h            |   17 +++++++++++++++++
> > >  target/ppc/translate_init.c |    3 +--
> > >  3 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr.c b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > > index 75e298b4c6be..1bb05a9a6b07 100644
> > > --- a/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr.c
> > > @@ -981,7 +981,6 @@ static void *spapr_build_fdt(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> > >      void *fdt;
> > >      sPAPRPHBState *phb;
> > >      char *buf;
> > > -    int smt = kvmppc_smt_threads();
> > >  
> > >      fdt = g_malloc0(FDT_MAX_SIZE);
> > >      _FDT((fdt_create_empty_tree(fdt, FDT_MAX_SIZE)));
> > > @@ -1021,7 +1020,7 @@ static void *spapr_build_fdt(sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> > >      _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, 0, "#size-cells", 2));
> > >  
> > >      /* /interrupt controller */
> > > -    spapr_dt_xics(DIV_ROUND_UP(max_cpus * smt, smp_threads), fdt, PHANDLE_XICP);
> > > +    spapr_dt_xics(ppc_cpu_dt_id_from_index(max_cpus), fdt, PHANDLE_XICP);
> > >  
> > >      ret = spapr_populate_memory(spapr, fdt);
> > >      if (ret < 0) {
> > > @@ -1977,7 +1976,6 @@ static void spapr_init_cpus(sPAPRMachineState *spapr)
> > >      MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr);
> > >      MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
> > >      char *type = spapr_get_cpu_core_type(machine->cpu_model);
> > > -    int smt = kvmppc_smt_threads();
> > >      const CPUArchIdList *possible_cpus;
> > >      int boot_cores_nr = smp_cpus / smp_threads;
> > >      int i;
> > > @@ -2014,7 +2012,7 @@ static void spapr_init_cpus(sPAPRMachineState *spapr)
> > >              sPAPRDRConnector *drc =
> > >                  spapr_dr_connector_new(OBJECT(spapr),
> > >                                         SPAPR_DR_CONNECTOR_TYPE_CPU,
> > > -                                       (core_id / smp_threads) * smt);
> > > +                                       ppc_cpu_dt_id_from_index(core_id));
> > >  
> > >              qemu_register_reset(spapr_drc_reset, drc);
> > >          }
> > > diff --git a/target/ppc/cpu.h b/target/ppc/cpu.h
> > > index 401e10e7dad8..47fe6c64698f 100644
> > > --- a/target/ppc/cpu.h
> > > +++ b/target/ppc/cpu.h
> > > @@ -2529,4 +2529,21 @@ int ppc_get_vcpu_dt_id(PowerPCCPU *cpu);
> > >  PowerPCCPU *ppc_get_vcpu_by_dt_id(int cpu_dt_id);
> > >  
> > >  void ppc_maybe_bswap_register(CPUPPCState *env, uint8_t *mem_buf, int len);
> > > +
> > > +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > > +#include "sysemu/cpus.h"
> > > +#include "target/ppc/kvm_ppc.h"
> > > +
> > > +static inline int ppc_cpu_dt_id_from_index(int cpu_index)
> > > +{
> > > +    /* POWER HV support has an historical limitation that different threads
> > > +     * on a single core cannot be in different guests at the same time. In
> > > +     * order to allow KVM to assign guest threads to host cores accordingly,
> > > +     * CPU device tree ids are spaced by the number of threads per host cores.
> > > +     */
> > > +    return (cpu_index / smp_threads) * kvmppc_smt_threads()
> > > +        + (cpu_index % smp_threads);
> > > +}
> > > +#endif
> > > +
> > >  #endif /* PPC_CPU_H */
> > > diff --git a/target/ppc/translate_init.c b/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> > > index 56a0ab22cfbe..837a9a496a65 100644
> > > --- a/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> > > +++ b/target/ppc/translate_init.c
> > > @@ -9851,8 +9851,7 @@ static void ppc_cpu_realizefn(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
> > >      }
> > >  
> > >  #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > > -    cpu->cpu_dt_id = (cs->cpu_index / smp_threads) * max_smt
> > > -        + (cs->cpu_index % smp_threads);
> > > +    cpu->cpu_dt_id = ppc_cpu_dt_id_from_index(cs->cpu_index);
> > >  
> > >      if (kvm_enabled() && !kvm_vcpu_id_is_valid(cpu->cpu_dt_id)) {
> > >          error_setg(errp, "Can't create CPU with id %d in KVM", cpu->cpu_dt_id);
> > >   
> >   
> 
> 
> 


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-05-22 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-19 10:31 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] spapr/xics: fix migration of older machine types Greg Kurz
2017-05-19 10:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] spapr_cpu_core: drop reference on ICP object during CPU realization Greg Kurz
2017-05-20  6:40   ` David Gibson
2017-05-19 10:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] spapr: fix error reporting in xics_system_init() Greg Kurz
2017-05-20  6:45   ` David Gibson
2017-05-21 17:03     ` Greg Kurz
2017-05-22  1:26       ` David Gibson
2017-05-22  7:41       ` Markus Armbruster
2017-05-22  9:00         ` David Gibson
2017-05-19 10:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] target/ppc: consolidate CPU device-tree id computation in helper Greg Kurz
2017-05-22  2:04   ` David Gibson
2017-05-22  2:12     ` David Gibson
2017-05-22  9:09       ` Greg Kurz
2017-05-22 14:33       ` Greg Kurz [this message]
2017-05-23  2:37         ` David Gibson
2017-05-22  8:59     ` Greg Kurz
2017-05-22 13:13       ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-ppc] " Greg Kurz
2017-05-23  6:37         ` David Gibson
2017-05-23  2:35       ` [Qemu-devel] " David Gibson
2017-05-23  6:57         ` Greg Kurz
2017-05-19 10:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] spapr: fix migration of ICP objects from/to older QEMU Greg Kurz
2017-05-22  2:30   ` David Gibson
2017-05-22  7:20     ` Cédric Le Goater
2017-05-22  9:15       ` David Gibson
2017-05-22 15:04         ` Greg Kurz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170522163336.3ace23ab@bahia.lan \
    --to=groug@kaod.org \
    --cc=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=clg@kaod.org \
    --cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=lvivier@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.