From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: andrew@lunn.ch (Andrew Lunn) Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 14:02:37 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 08/13] ARM: dts: armada-385-linksys: use binary unit prefixes In-Reply-To: <20170523103302.4f78eb93@gmail.com> References: <20170521124903.11050-1-ralph.sennhauser@gmail.com> <20170521124903.11050-9-ralph.sennhauser@gmail.com> <20170522150001.GM29447@lunn.ch> <20170522202416.1c48d91a@gmail.com> <20170523103302.4f78eb93@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20170523120237.GO13759@lunn.ch> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:33:02AM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > On Mon, 22 May 2017 20:24:16 +0200 > Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 May 2017 17:00:01 +0200 > > Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:48:57PM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > > > > Use IEEE 1541-2002 unit prefixes for sizes. > > > > > > Does ePAPR recommend this? > > > > Not directly, but the paper (v1.1) itself is using MiB as well which > > could be seen as a recommendation. > > Found the pdf again on the web, so here a link: > http://elinux.org/images/c/cf/Power_ePAPR_APPROVED_v1.1.pdf > > Funny thing it's using KB(instead of KiB) and MiB. So it's > inconsistent, also the unit with SI prefix would be kB and not KB. So > I'd say ePAPR doesn't care / the authors didn't pay any attention to > this. Hi Ralph Thanks for checking into this. My preference, and it is only a preference, is to not do this. Keep with MB, KB. Andrew From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Lunn Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] ARM: dts: armada-385-linksys: use binary unit prefixes Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 14:02:37 +0200 Message-ID: <20170523120237.GO13759@lunn.ch> References: <20170521124903.11050-1-ralph.sennhauser@gmail.com> <20170521124903.11050-9-ralph.sennhauser@gmail.com> <20170522150001.GM29447@lunn.ch> <20170522202416.1c48d91a@gmail.com> <20170523103302.4f78eb93@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170523103302.4f78eb93-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ralph Sennhauser Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Gregory Clement , Imre Kaloz , Jason Cooper , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:33:02AM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > On Mon, 22 May 2017 20:24:16 +0200 > Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 May 2017 17:00:01 +0200 > > Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:48:57PM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > > > > Use IEEE 1541-2002 unit prefixes for sizes. > > > > > > Does ePAPR recommend this? > > > > Not directly, but the paper (v1.1) itself is using MiB as well which > > could be seen as a recommendation. > > Found the pdf again on the web, so here a link: > http://elinux.org/images/c/cf/Power_ePAPR_APPROVED_v1.1.pdf > > Funny thing it's using KB(instead of KiB) and MiB. So it's > inconsistent, also the unit with SI prefix would be kB and not KB. So > I'd say ePAPR doesn't care / the authors didn't pay any attention to > this. Hi Ralph Thanks for checking into this. My preference, and it is only a preference, is to not do this. Keep with MB, KB. Andrew -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1763711AbdEWMC4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2017 08:02:56 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([178.209.37.122]:41123 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759899AbdEWMCx (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 May 2017 08:02:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 May 2017 14:02:37 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Ralph Sennhauser Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Gregory Clement , Imre Kaloz , Jason Cooper , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/13] ARM: dts: armada-385-linksys: use binary unit prefixes Message-ID: <20170523120237.GO13759@lunn.ch> References: <20170521124903.11050-1-ralph.sennhauser@gmail.com> <20170521124903.11050-9-ralph.sennhauser@gmail.com> <20170522150001.GM29447@lunn.ch> <20170522202416.1c48d91a@gmail.com> <20170523103302.4f78eb93@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170523103302.4f78eb93@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 10:33:02AM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > On Mon, 22 May 2017 20:24:16 +0200 > Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > > > On Mon, 22 May 2017 17:00:01 +0200 > > Andrew Lunn wrote: > > > > > On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 02:48:57PM +0200, Ralph Sennhauser wrote: > > > > Use IEEE 1541-2002 unit prefixes for sizes. > > > > > > Does ePAPR recommend this? > > > > Not directly, but the paper (v1.1) itself is using MiB as well which > > could be seen as a recommendation. > > Found the pdf again on the web, so here a link: > http://elinux.org/images/c/cf/Power_ePAPR_APPROVED_v1.1.pdf > > Funny thing it's using KB(instead of KiB) and MiB. So it's > inconsistent, also the unit with SI prefix would be kB and not KB. So > I'd say ePAPR doesn't care / the authors didn't pay any attention to > this. Hi Ralph Thanks for checking into this. My preference, and it is only a preference, is to not do this. Keep with MB, KB. Andrew