From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S967385AbdEYHGj (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 25 May 2017 03:06:39 -0400
Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:44803 "EHLO mga03.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1755772AbdEYHGf (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 25 May 2017 03:06:35 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.38,390,1491289200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="972854759"
Date: Thu, 25 May 2017 10:02:08 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        Andreas Noever <andreas.noever@gmail.com>,
        Michael Jamet <michael.jamet@intel.com>,
        Yehezkel Bernat <yehezkel.bernat@intel.com>,
        Amir Levy <amir.jer.levy@intel.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Mario.Limonciello@dell.com, Jared.Dominguez@dell.com,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/24] thunderbolt: Let the connection manager handle all
 notifications
Message-ID: <20170525070208.GH8541@lahna.fi.intel.com>
References: <20170518143914.60902-1-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
 <20170518143914.60902-15-mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
 <20170524140049.aaif5724kwfgs33e@wunner.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170524140049.aaif5724kwfgs33e@wunner.de>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 04:00:49PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 05:39:04PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > @@ -320,18 +330,42 @@ static void tb_ctl_rx_callback(struct tb_ring *ring, struct ring_frame *frame,
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	frame->size -= 4; /* remove checksum */
> > -	if (*(__be32 *) (pkg->buffer + frame->size)
> > -			!= tb_crc(pkg->buffer, frame->size)) {
> > -		tb_ctl_err(pkg->ctl,
> > -			   "RX: checksum mismatch, dropping packet\n");
> > -		goto rx;
> > -	}
> > +	crc32 = tb_crc(pkg->buffer, frame->size);
> >  	be32_to_cpu_array(pkg->buffer, pkg->buffer, frame->size / 4);
> >  
> > -	if (frame->eof == TB_CFG_PKG_EVENT) {
> > -		tb_ctl_handle_plug_event(pkg->ctl, pkg);
> > +	switch (frame->eof) {
> > +	case TB_CFG_PKG_READ:
> > +	case TB_CFG_PKG_WRITE:
> > +	case TB_CFG_PKG_ERROR:
> > +	case TB_CFG_PKG_OVERRIDE:
> > +	case TB_CFG_PKG_RESET:
> > +		if (*(__be32 *)(pkg->buffer + frame->size) != crc32) {
> > +			tb_ctl_err(pkg->ctl,
> > +				   "RX: checksum mismatch, dropping packet\n");
> > +			goto rx;
> > +		}
> 
> Any harm keeping the crc32 check above the switch/case statement?
> (And thus also execute it for unknown packets?)

Not all packets carry crc32, only these configuration space packets.

> > +	case TB_CFG_PKG_EVENT:
> > +		if (*(__be32 *)(pkg->buffer + frame->size) != crc32) {
> > +			tb_ctl_err(pkg->ctl,
> > +				   "RX: checksum mismatch, dropping packet\n");
> > +			goto rx;
> > +		}
> > +		tb_ctl_handle_event(pkg->ctl, frame->eof, pkg, frame->size);
> > +		goto rx;
> > +
> > +	default:
> > +		tb_ctl_dbg(pkg->ctl, "RX: unknown package %#x, dropping\n",
> 
> The packet / package terminology is a bit inconsistent here.
> Andreas originally used package.  What's the term used by the TB spec?

IIRC it uses packet.