All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] splice: default to iter based versions implicitly
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 08:48:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530074853.GF6365@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170530071115.GE6365@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 08:11:15AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, May 28, 2017 at 12:48:05PM +0300, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > If a file_operations instance has the read or write iter methods we should
> > use the iter based splice code by default.  We still allow to overide it
> > with explicit ->read_iter and ->write_iter methods, but few of them are
> > left, and there is a non-zero chance that we could get rid of them in the
> > future.
> 
> ->read_iter() side:  you are changing behaviour for the following bunch:

->write_iter(): a whole lot more changed ones; OTOH, ITER_BDEV is less painful
that ITER_PIPE.

arch/s390/hypfs/inode.c:438:    .write_iter     = hypfs_write_iter,
drivers/bluetooth/hci_vhci.c:368:       .write_iter     = vhci_write,
drivers/char/mem.c:814: .write_iter     = write_iter_zero,
drivers/char/raw.c:287: .write_iter     = blkdev_write_iter,
drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/file_ops.c:110:      .write_iter = hfi1_write_iter,
drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_file_ops.c:72:    .write_iter = qib_write_iter,
drivers/net/tap.c:1135: .write_iter     = tap_write_iter,
drivers/net/tun.c:2424: .write_iter = tun_chr_write_iter,
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c:3119:        .write_iter = ll_file_write_iter,
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c:3132:        .write_iter   = ll_file_write_iter,
drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/llite/file.c:3148:        .write_iter   = ll_file_write_iter,
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_fs.c:1253:        .write_iter =   ffs_epfile_write_iter,
drivers/usb/gadget/legacy/inode.c:705:  .write_iter =   ep_write_iter,
drivers/vhost/net.c:1250:       .write_iter     = vhost_net_chr_write_iter,
fs/9p/vfs_file.c:642:   .write_iter = generic_file_write_iter,
fs/9p/vfs_file.c:653:   .write_iter = generic_file_write_iter,
fs/9p/vfs_file.c:665:   .write_iter = v9fs_file_write_iter,
fs/9p/vfs_file.c:676:   .write_iter = v9fs_file_write_iter,
fs/9p/vfs_file.c:688:   .write_iter = v9fs_mmap_file_write_iter,
fs/9p/vfs_file.c:699:   .write_iter = v9fs_mmap_file_write_iter,
fs/adfs/file.c:29:      .write_iter     = generic_file_write_iter,
fs/affs/file.c:972:     .write_iter     = generic_file_write_iter,
fs/afs/file.c:37:       .write_iter     = afs_file_write,
fs/bfs/file.c:27:       .write_iter     = generic_file_write_iter,
fs/btrfs/file.c:3078:   .write_iter     = btrfs_file_write_iter,
fs/cifs/cifsfs.c:1064:  .write_iter = cifs_file_write_iter,
fs/cifs/cifsfs.c:1082:  .write_iter = cifs_strict_writev,
fs/cifs/cifsfs.c:1101:  .write_iter = cifs_user_writev,  
fs/cifs/cifsfs.c:1119:  .write_iter = cifs_file_write_iter,
fs/cifs/cifsfs.c:1136:  .write_iter = cifs_strict_writev,
fs/cifs/cifsfs.c:1154:  .write_iter = cifs_user_writev,
fs/coda/file.c:202:     .write_iter     = coda_file_write_iter,
fs/ecryptfs/file.c:414: .write_iter = generic_file_write_iter,
fs/fat/file.c:175:      .write_iter     = generic_file_write_iter,
fs/fuse/cuse.c:181:     .write_iter             = cuse_write_iter,
fs/fuse/file.c:3010:    .write_iter     = fuse_file_write_iter,
fs/fuse/file.c:3028:    .write_iter     = fuse_direct_write_iter,
fs/hfs/inode.c:681:     .write_iter     = generic_file_write_iter,
fs/hfsplus/inode.c:347: .write_iter     = generic_file_write_iter,
fs/hostfs/hostfs_kern.c:392:    .write_iter     = generic_file_write_iter,
fs/hpfs/file.c:211:     .write_iter     = generic_file_write_iter,
fs/jffs2/file.c:55:     .write_iter =   generic_file_write_iter,
fs/minix/file.c:18:     .write_iter     = generic_file_write_iter,
fs/ncpfs/file.c:249:    .write_iter     = ncp_file_write_iter,
fs/nilfs2/file.c:143:   .write_iter     = generic_file_write_iter,
fs/ntfs/file.c:2024:    .write_iter     = ntfs_file_write_iter,
fs/omfs/file.c:341:     .write_iter = generic_file_write_iter,
fs/orangefs/devorangefs-req.c:834:      .write_iter = orangefs_devreq_write_iter,
fs/orangefs/file.c:744: .write_iter     = orangefs_file_write_iter,
fs/sysv/file.c:25:      .write_iter     = generic_file_write_iter,
fs/udf/file.c:244:      .write_iter             = udf_file_write_iter,
fs/ufs/file.c:39:       .write_iter     = generic_file_write_iter,
kernel/printk/printk.c:999:     .write_iter = devkmsg_write,
sound/core/pcm_native.c:3682:           .write_iter =           snd_pcm_writev,

adfs, affs, afs, bfs, btrfs, coda, fat, ecryptfs, hfs, hfsplus, hostfs, hpfs,
jffs2, minix, ncpfs, nilfs2, omfs, orangefs, sysv, udf, ufs: should be OK
ntfs: probably OK
9p: depends upon p9_client_write() safety, very likely to be OK.
cifs: probably OK
fuse/cuse: might be OK, needs testing
lustre: probably OK
drivers/char/mem: ought to use splice_write_null(), actually.
drivers/char/raw: should be OK
gadgetfs: needs testing, might be OK
bluetooth, orangefs devreq, devkmsg, tun/tap, vhost: will break.  These are
datagram-oriented and currently pipe buffers  serve as datagram boundaries.
With this change the would get concatenated, with bogus results.
hypfs, infinibarf, sound: fuck, no

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-30  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-05-28  9:48 splice simplification Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-28  9:48 ` [PATCH 1/3] splice: default to iter based versions implicitly Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-28 15:51   ` Jeff Layton
2017-05-30  7:11   ` Al Viro
2017-05-30  7:48     ` Al Viro [this message]
2017-05-28  9:48 ` [PATCH 2/3] splice: remove the old default splice_read/splice_write implementations Christoph Hellwig
2017-05-28  9:48 ` [PATCH 3/3] fs: mark vfs_readv and vfs_writev static Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170530074853.GF6365@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.