From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] netvsc: optimize calculation of number of slots Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 10:16:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20170530101651.01222b83@xeon-e3> References: <20170529183159.22205-1-sthemmin@microsoft.com> <20170529.204204.1236270965995441170.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, sthemmin@microsoft.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail-pf0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]:36215 "EHLO mail-pf0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751134AbdE3RQz (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 May 2017 13:16:55 -0400 Received: by mail-pf0-f171.google.com with SMTP id m17so77924001pfg.3 for ; Tue, 30 May 2017 10:16:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20170529.204204.1236270965995441170.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 29 May 2017 20:42:04 -0400 (EDT) David Miller wrote: > Stephen, please provide proper header "[PATCH net-next 0/3] " postings > with your patch series, so we know at a high level what this patch > series is doing, how it is doing it, and why it is doing it that > way. Sure, these were just misc small cleanups. Prefer to send them out in small chunks, not mixed with bug fixes and new features. > I've been quite liberal with your patch postings in the past, hoping > you would catch on, but now I'm going to simply enforce what I ask > of every other patch series submitter. Sorry, thought it was obvious from content.