From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Gioh Kim <gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>
Cc: andre.przywara@amd.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] KVM: SVM: ignore type when setting segment registers
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 14:54:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530125420.GA19724@potion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1496064244-14785-1-git-send-email-gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com>
2017-05-29 15:24+0200, Gioh Kim:
> Current code sets unusable as 1 if present is 1 and type is 0.
> In Long mode, type value in segment descriptor is ignored.
> So I think type should be ignored when setting the segment registers,
> if type means the descriptor type in the segment descriptor.
>
> Is the type field of struct kvm_segment the descriptor type?
Yes.
> If so, why type is checked when setting segment registers?
No idea. 19bca6ab75d8 ("KVM: SVM: Fix cross vendor migration issue with
unusable bit") also moved the assigment up to initialize it before use
and I think that is enough.
> If the type field is not the descriptor type,
> is it ok to set unusable when present is 1?
Looks like a bug. type = 0 can be a usable read-only data segment.
> I'm copying a code as following to show what code I'm asking.
Please send it as a patch,
thanks.
> ----------------------------- 8< ---------------------------------
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> index 5f48f62..0133f6f 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
> @@ -1803,7 +1803,7 @@ static void svm_get_segment(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> * AMD's VMCB does not have an explicit unusable field, so emulate it
> * for cross vendor migration purposes by "not present"
> */
> - var->unusable = !var->present || (var->type == 0);
> + var->unusable = !var->present;
>
> switch (seg) {
> case VCPU_SREG_TR:
> --
> 2.5.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-30 12:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-29 13:24 [RFC] KVM: SVM: ignore type when setting segment registers Gioh Kim
2017-05-30 12:54 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2017-05-30 13:37 ` Gioh Kim
2017-05-30 18:03 ` Matt Mullins
2017-05-31 6:42 ` Gi-Oh Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170530125420.GA19724@potion \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@amd.com \
--cc=gi-oh.kim@profitbricks.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.