From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: staging aarch64 build fails in xc_dom_arm.c Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 17:40:01 +0200 Message-ID: <20170530154000.GG26792@aepfle.de> References: <20170530152735.GA19868@aepfle.de> <7ec75007-2067-8c71-625c-b22ba5f0f0d9@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8600437286639804606==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <7ec75007-2067-8c71-625c-b22ba5f0f0d9@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: Andrew Cooper Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============8600437286639804606== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="z9ECzHErBrwFF8sy" Content-Disposition: inline --z9ECzHErBrwFF8sy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, May 30, Andrew Cooper wrote: > Does > + domctl.u.address_size.size = 0; > help? Likely yes. I just scanned the buildlogs and found this failure. I do not have a ARM toolchain around to double check. Not sure why the marco, or its usage, is not like 'struct xen_domctl domctl = {}' Olaf --z9ECzHErBrwFF8sy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iF0EARECAB0WIQSkRyP6Rn//f03pRUBdQqD6ppg2fgUCWS2STQAKCRBdQqD6ppg2 fukMAJ4u7HMq3iH7ndfyOyS+fSfn/sb6DwCg+Vg8+P8t1+5W/214vkjxhsdu9ls= =4l7o -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --z9ECzHErBrwFF8sy-- --===============8600437286639804606== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwczovL2xpc3RzLnhlbi5v cmcveGVuLWRldmVsCg== --===============8600437286639804606==--