Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/3] migration: Use savevm_handlers instead of loadvm copy

["Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>]

* Juan Quintela (quintela@redhat.com) wrote:
> There is no reason for having the loadvm_handlers at all.  There is
> only one use, and we can use the savevm handlers.
> 
> We will remove the loadvm handlers on a following patch.

<snip>

>      trace_qemu_loadvm_state_section_partend(section_id);
> -    QLIST_FOREACH(le, &mis->loadvm_handlers, entry) {
> -        if (le->section_id == section_id) {
> +    QTAILQ_FOREACH(se, &savevm_state.handlers, entry) {
> +        if (se->section_id == section_id) {

Isn't this the problem?  What guarantees that the se->section_id
is the same as the source's section_id - I don't think anything.
It's just dynamically allocated in register_savevm_live so the
initialisation order on source/dest could be different and you'd
get different ID.  You can't update se->section_id
unless you guaranteed to updated all of them.

Dave

>              break;
>          }
>      }
> -    if (le == NULL) {
> +    if (se == NULL) {
>          error_report("Unknown savevm section %d", section_id);
>          return -EINVAL;
>      }
>  
> -    ret = vmstate_load(f, le->se, le->version_id);
> +    ret = vmstate_load(f, se, se->load_version_id);
>      if (ret < 0) {
>          error_report("error while loading state section id %d(%s)",
> -                     section_id, le->se->idstr);
> +                     section_id, se->idstr);
>          return ret;
>      }
> -    if (!check_section_footer(f, le)) {
> +    if (!check_section_footer(f, se)) {
>          return -EINVAL;
>      }
>  
> -- 
> 2.9.4
> 
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK