From: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@fb.com>
To: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
<kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 7/9] bpf: use different interpreter depending on required stack size
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 13:31:33 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170530203135.3642768-8-ast@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170530203135.3642768-1-ast@fb.com>
16 __bpf_prog_run() interpreters for various stack sizes add .text
but not a lot comparing to run-time stack savings
text data bss dec hex filename
26350 10328 624 37302 91b6 kernel/bpf/core.o.before_split
25777 10328 624 36729 8f79 kernel/bpf/core.o.after_split
26970 10328 624 37922 9422 kernel/bpf/core.o.now
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
---
kernel/bpf/core.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index abd410d394bc..774069ca18a7 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -1218,16 +1218,38 @@ static unsigned int ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs, const struct bpf_insn *insn,
}
STACK_FRAME_NON_STANDARD(___bpf_prog_run); /* jump table */
-static unsigned int __bpf_prog_run(void *ctx, const struct bpf_insn *insn)
-{
- u64 stack[MAX_BPF_STACK / sizeof(u64)];
- u64 regs[MAX_BPF_REG];
-
- FP = (u64) (unsigned long) &stack[ARRAY_SIZE(stack)];
- ARG1 = (u64) (unsigned long) ctx;
- return ___bpf_prog_run(regs, insn, stack);
+#define PROG_NAME(stack_size) __bpf_prog_run##stack_size
+#define DEFINE_BPF_PROG_RUN(stack_size) \
+static unsigned int PROG_NAME(stack_size)(const void *ctx, const struct bpf_insn *insn) \
+{ \
+ u64 stack[stack_size / sizeof(u64)]; \
+ u64 regs[MAX_BPF_REG]; \
+\
+ FP = (u64) (unsigned long) &stack[ARRAY_SIZE(stack)]; \
+ ARG1 = (u64) (unsigned long) ctx; \
+ return ___bpf_prog_run(regs, insn, stack); \
}
+#define EVAL1(FN, X) FN(X)
+#define EVAL2(FN, X, Y...) FN(X) EVAL1(FN, Y)
+#define EVAL3(FN, X, Y...) FN(X) EVAL2(FN, Y)
+#define EVAL4(FN, X, Y...) FN(X) EVAL3(FN, Y)
+#define EVAL5(FN, X, Y...) FN(X) EVAL4(FN, Y)
+#define EVAL6(FN, X, Y...) FN(X) EVAL5(FN, Y)
+
+EVAL6(DEFINE_BPF_PROG_RUN, 32, 64, 96, 128, 160, 192);
+EVAL6(DEFINE_BPF_PROG_RUN, 224, 256, 288, 320, 352, 384);
+EVAL4(DEFINE_BPF_PROG_RUN, 416, 448, 480, 512);
+
+#define PROG_NAME_LIST(stack_size) PROG_NAME(stack_size),
+
+static unsigned int (*interpreters[])(const void *ctx,
+ const struct bpf_insn *insn) = {
+EVAL6(PROG_NAME_LIST, 32, 64, 96, 128, 160, 192)
+EVAL6(PROG_NAME_LIST, 224, 256, 288, 320, 352, 384)
+EVAL4(PROG_NAME_LIST, 416, 448, 480, 512)
+};
+
bool bpf_prog_array_compatible(struct bpf_array *array,
const struct bpf_prog *fp)
{
@@ -1275,7 +1297,7 @@ static int bpf_check_tail_call(const struct bpf_prog *fp)
*/
struct bpf_prog *bpf_prog_select_runtime(struct bpf_prog *fp, int *err)
{
- fp->bpf_func = (void *) __bpf_prog_run;
+ fp->bpf_func = interpreters[round_down(fp->aux->stack_depth, 32) / 32];
/* eBPF JITs can rewrite the program in case constant
* blinding is active. However, in case of error during
--
2.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-30 20:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-30 20:31 [PATCH net-next 0/9] bpf: stack depth tracking Alexei Starovoitov
2017-05-30 20:31 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] bpf: free up BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL | BPF_X opcode Alexei Starovoitov
2017-05-30 20:31 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] bpf: split bpf core interpreter Alexei Starovoitov
2017-05-30 20:31 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] bpf: teach verifier to track stack depth Alexei Starovoitov
2017-05-30 20:31 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] bpf: reconcile bpf_tail_call and stack_depth Alexei Starovoitov
2017-05-30 20:31 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] bpf: track stack depth of classic bpf programs Alexei Starovoitov
2017-05-30 20:31 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] bpf: fix stack_depth usage by test_bpf.ko Alexei Starovoitov
2017-05-31 18:15 ` David Miller
2017-05-31 18:39 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-05-31 18:43 ` David Miller
2017-05-31 18:45 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-05-31 22:41 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2017-05-31 23:30 ` David Miller
2017-06-06 10:19 ` Daniel Borkmann
2017-05-30 20:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2017-05-30 20:31 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] bpf: change x86 JITed program stack layout Alexei Starovoitov
2017-05-30 20:31 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] bpf: take advantage of stack_depth tracking in x64 JIT Alexei Starovoitov
2017-05-31 23:30 ` [PATCH net-next 0/9] bpf: stack depth tracking David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170530203135.3642768-8-ast@fb.com \
--to=ast@fb.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.