From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org (mail.linuxfoundation.org [140.211.169.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3whgQ51ZydzDqFR for ; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 15:35:40 +1000 (AEST) Received: from localhost (LFbn-1-12060-104.w90-92.abo.wanadoo.fr [90.92.122.104]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AF161957; Tue, 6 Jun 2017 05:35:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2017 07:35:31 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Joel Stanley Cc: Rob Lippert , Robert Lippert , OpenBMC Maillist , Arnd Bergmann Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers/misc: add Aspeed LPC snoop driver Message-ID: <20170606053531.GA21809@kroah.com> References: <20170602215322.24376-1-rlippert@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2017 05:35:41 -0000 On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 11:46:56AM +0930, Joel Stanley wrote: > On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Rob Lippert wrote: > > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 8:25 PM, Joel Stanley wrote: > >> Hello Rob, > >> > >> On Sat, Jun 3, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Robert Lippert wrote: > >>> This driver enables the LPC snoop hardware on the ASPEED BMC > >>> which generates an interrupt upon every write to an I/O port > >>> by the host. > >>> > >>> This is typically used to monitor BIOS boot progress by listening > >>> to well-known debug port 80h. > >>> > >>> The functionality in this commit just saves all snooped values > >>> to a circular 2K buffer in the kernel, subsequent commits can > >>> act on the values to do things with them. > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley > >> > >> The driver looks okay to me. I can stage it in the OpenBMC kernel tree > >> while we get it reviewed upstream. > >> > >> Can you re-send to the upstream mailing lists so it gets reviewed > >> there. You will need to include a device tree binding document too > >> (something to put in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/). > > > > What is the proper upstream mailing list for this? patman didn't list > > any mailing lists... > > Yeah, get_maintainers.pl only suggested lkml. cc lkml I think. > > I'm not sure if we want to put these drivers in misc, or if we want to > use something like drivers/soc/aspeed. > > Arnd, Greg, do you have any suggestions here? It's up to you :)