From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steffen Klassert Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfrm: fix xfrm_dev_event() missing when compile without CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2017 12:59:02 +0200 Message-ID: <20170607105902.GU2631@secunet.com> References: <1496277502-10642-1-git-send-email-liuhangbin@gmail.com> <1496300276-30901-1-git-send-email-liuhangbin@gmail.com> <20170606080658.GO2631@secunet.com> <20170606092600.GC12974@leo.usersys.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: , Guy Shapiro , David Miller To: Hangbin Liu Return-path: Received: from a.mx.secunet.com ([62.96.220.36]:35284 "EHLO a.mx.secunet.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751008AbdFGK7G (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Jun 2017 06:59:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170606092600.GC12974@leo.usersys.redhat.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 05:26:01PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2017 at 10:06:58AM +0200, Steffen Klassert wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 01, 2017 at 02:57:56PM +0800, Hangbin Liu wrote: > > > In commit d77e38e612a0 ("xfrm: Add an IPsec hardware offloading API") we > > > make xfrm_device.o only compiled when enable option CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD. > > > But this will make xfrm_dev_event() missing if we only enable default XFRM > > > options. > > > > > > Then if we set down and unregister an interface with IPsec on it. > > > > You should not be able to register an interface with IPsec offload > > without CONFIG_XFRM_OFFLOAD. > > Yes, I mean when compile with default CONFIG_XFRM, the xfrm_dev_event() -> > xfrm_dev_down() -> xfrm_garbage_collect() will missing. Ok, I see what you mean now. Thanks for the explanation!