diff for duplicates of <20170609140853.GA14760@cmpxchg.org> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 3ff9523..437cafc 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -47,9 +47,3 @@ I'm not a fan of defensive programming, but is this call to OOM more expensive than the printk() somehow? And how certain are you that no VM_FAULT_OOMs will leak, given how spread out page fault handlers and how complex the different allocation contexts inside them are? - --- -To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in -the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, -see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . -Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a> diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 8c602cc..c43d89a 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -61,12 +61,6 @@ "I'm not a fan of defensive programming, but is this call to OOM more\n" "expensive than the printk() somehow? And how certain are you that no\n" "VM_FAULT_OOMs will leak, given how spread out page fault handlers and\n" - "how complex the different allocation contexts inside them are?\n" - "\n" - "--\n" - "To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in\n" - "the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,\n" - "see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .\n" - "Don't email: <a href=mailto:\"dont@kvack.org\"> email@kvack.org </a>" + how complex the different allocation contexts inside them are? -4bb79e53f8d516e7f505f580c0c0f751dea1840f5d9417317ce255cf96aa5fcc +7089c5661490c87a01b7cfc3f7460d3895d5ecb91202ae86d2011698d8fc8fae
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.