From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: WMI and Kernel:User interface
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 11:09:13 -0700
Message-ID: <20170613180913.GB22450@fury>
References: <20170509231639.GB11404@fury>
 <201706131916.12144@pali>
 <20170613174027.GL27850@fury>
 <201706132000.30449@pali>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201706132000.30449@pali>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Pali =?iso-8859-1?Q?Roh=E1r?= <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>, Mario Limonciello <mario_limonciello@dell.com>, Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>, Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: platform-driver-x86.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 08:00:30PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> 
> I just tried to show that proposed proxy has above problem and looks 
> like anti-pattern for linux kernel. As this should be evaluated when 
> going to accept or reject it.

OK, I think at this point we need to follow Greg's advice and get some
code out there for review. I don't think we're going to make more
progress in pre-code discussions.

Thanks for all the time and effort everyone has put into the discussion.

-- 
Darren Hart
VMware Open Source Technology Center