From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: jiangshanlai@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WARN_ON_ONCE() in process_one_work()?
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 15:31:03 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170613223103.GX3721@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170613205837.GB7359@htj.duckdns.org>
On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 04:58:37PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Paul.
>
> On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 10:11:59AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > Just following up... I have hit this bug a couple of times over the
> > past few days. Anything I can do to help?
>
> My apologies for dropping the ball on this. I've gone over the hot
> plug code in workqueue several times but can't really find how this
> would happen. Can you please apply the following patch and see what
> it says when the problem happens?
I have fired it up, thank you!
Last time I saw one failure in 21 hours of test runs, so I have kicked
of 42 one-hour test runs. Will see what happens tomorrow morning,
Pacific Time.
Thanx, Paul
> Thanks.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index c74bf39ef764..bd2ce3cbfb41 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -1691,13 +1691,20 @@ static struct worker *alloc_worker(int node)
> static void worker_attach_to_pool(struct worker *worker,
> struct worker_pool *pool)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> mutex_lock(&pool->attach_mutex);
>
> /*
> * set_cpus_allowed_ptr() will fail if the cpumask doesn't have any
> * online CPUs. It'll be re-applied when any of the CPUs come up.
> */
> - set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask);
> + ret = set_cpus_allowed_ptr(worker->task, pool->attrs->cpumask);
> +
> + WARN(ret && !(pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED),
> + "set_cpus_allowed_ptr failed, ret=%d pool->cpu/flags=%d/0x%x cpumask=%*pbl online=%*pbl active=%*pbl\n",
> + ret, pool->cpu, pool->flags, cpumask_pr_args(pool->attrs->cpumask),
> + cpumask_pr_args(cpu_online_mask), cpumask_pr_args(cpu_active_mask));
>
> /*
> * The pool->attach_mutex ensures %POOL_DISASSOCIATED remains
> @@ -2037,8 +2044,11 @@ __acquires(&pool->lock)
> lockdep_copy_map(&lockdep_map, &work->lockdep_map);
> #endif
> /* ensure we're on the correct CPU */
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!(pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED) &&
> - raw_smp_processor_id() != pool->cpu);
> + if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(pool->flags & POOL_DISASSOCIATED) &&
> + raw_smp_processor_id() != pool->cpu))
> + printk_once("XXX workfn=%pf pool->cpu/flags=%d/0x%x curcpu=%d online=%*pbl active=%*pbl\n",
> + work->func, pool->cpu, pool->flags, raw_smp_processor_id(),
> + cpumask_pr_args(cpu_online_mask), cpumask_pr_args(cpu_active_mask));
>
> /*
> * A single work shouldn't be executed concurrently by
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-13 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-01 16:57 WARN_ON_ONCE() in process_one_work()? Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-01 18:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-01 18:44 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-01 18:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-05 17:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-13 20:58 ` Tejun Heo
2017-06-13 22:31 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
2017-06-14 15:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-15 15:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-16 17:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-17 11:53 ` Tejun Heo
2017-06-17 17:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-18 10:40 ` Tejun Heo
2017-06-20 16:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-21 15:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-23 16:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-06-27 16:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-05-01 18:42 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-01 19:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-05-01 19:50 ` Tejun Heo
2017-05-01 20:02 ` Steven Rostedt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2018-06-20 19:29 Paul E. McKenney
2018-07-02 21:05 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-03 4:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-07-03 16:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-07-03 20:12 ` Tejun Heo
2018-07-03 21:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170613223103.GX3721@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.