All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>
Subject: perf: unwind: target platform=x86 not supported was:  Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf evsel: Fix probing of precise_ip level for default cycles event
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:52:42 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170614135242.GD32020@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170614132947.GC32020@kernel.org>

Em Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 10:29:47AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 07:45:01AM +0200, Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> >  triton:~/tip> perf report --stdio
> >  unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> >  unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> >  unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> >  unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> >  unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> >  unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> >  unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> >  unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> 
> > # ========
> > # captured on: Wed Jun 14 07:34:42 2017
> > # hostname : triton
> > # os release : 4.10.0-23-generic
> > # perf version : 4.12.rc5.g9688eb
> > # arch : x86_64
> > # nrcpus online : 12
> > # nrcpus avail : 12
> > # cpudesc : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4960X CPU @ 3.60GHz
> > # cpuid : GenuineIntel,6,62,4
> > # total memory : 65917012 kB
> > # cmdline : /home/mingo/bin/perf record /home/mingo/hackbench 10 
> 
> > let me know if you need more info.
> > 
> > Btw., note that there's also this warning:
> > 
> >   unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported
> > 
> > (but that's unrelated to this commit.)
> 
> Ok, what distro? Do you have libunwind-devel installed? I couldn't
> reproduce this one here with/without it installed, to test I build it
> with:
> 
>  make ARCH=x86_64 O=/tmp/build/perf -C tools/perf install-bin
> 
> and without that ARCH= setting, then I record with:
> 
>   perf record --call-graph dwarf -a sleep 2
> 
> and try what you said emitted that warning:
> 
>   perf report --stdio

So, the "unwind: target platform=x86 is not supported" comes only from:

a  tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind.c

That is linked by:

  $ grep libunwind-local tools/perf/util/Build 
  libperf-$(CONFIG_LOCAL_LIBUNWIND)    += unwind-libunwind-local.o
  $

And here CONFIG_LOCAL_LIBUNWIND is detected:

  [acme@jouet linux]$ grep CONFIG_LOCAL_LIBUNWIND /tmp/build/perf/.config-detected
  CONFIG_LOCAL_LIBUNWIND=y
  [acme@jouet linux]$ 

And that message is there:

  [acme@jouet linux]$ strings ~/bin/perf | grep "unwind: target platform="
  unwind: target platform=%s is not supported
  [acme@jouet linux]$

So the only way for get to that point would be for
local_unwind_libunwind_ops to be NULL, which it will be if its __weak
definition seting it to zero isn't overriden by...

tools/perf/util/unwind-libunwind-local.c

#ifndef REMOTE_UNWIND_LIBUNWIND 
struct unwind_libunwind_ops * 
local_unwind_libunwind_ops = &_unwind_libunwind_ops;
#endif 

And what defines it is...

tools/perf/util/libunwind/x86_32.c:#define REMOTE_UNWIND_LIBUNWIND

(and a arm64 file, but lets leave that aside, seems unrelated to this
case)

That will get built by...

tools/perf/util/Build:libperf-$(CONFIG_LIBUNWIND_X86)      += libunwind/x86_32.o

[acme@jouet linux]$ grep CONFIG_LIBUNWIND_X86 /tmp/build/perf/.config-detected
[acme@jouet linux]$

Ingo, are you doing something unusual as building a 32-bit perf to read a
62-bit perf.data file?

Jiri, can you help here? Do you need more info?

- Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-14 13:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-13 23:23 [GIT PULL 0/2] perf/urgent fixes for 4.12 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-13 23:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf evsel: Fix probing of precise_ip level for default cycles event Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-14  5:45   ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-14 10:44     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-14 10:51       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-14 10:57         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-14 13:55           ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-14 14:44             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-14 13:29     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-14 13:52       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2017-06-14 14:19         ` perf: unwind: target platform=x86 not supported was: " Jiri Olsa
2017-06-14 14:31           ` Jiri Olsa
2017-06-14 14:47           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-14 14:06       ` Ingo Molnar
2017-06-14 14:46         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-14 19:12         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-13 23:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf tools: Fix build with ARCH=x86_64 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-14  5:33 ` [GIT PULL 0/2] perf/urgent fixes for 4.12 Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170614135242.GD32020@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.