From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:56194 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753141AbdFSMlj (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2017 08:41:39 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:41:38 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Sagi Grimberg Cc: linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, Christoph Hellwig , Keith Busch , linux-block@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH rfc 10/30] nvme: Add admin_tagset pointer to nvme_ctrl Message-ID: <20170619124138.GJ29061@lst.de> References: <1497799324-19598-1-git-send-email-sagi@grimberg.me> <1497799324-19598-11-git-send-email-sagi@grimberg.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1497799324-19598-11-git-send-email-sagi@grimberg.me> Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 06:21:44PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > Will be used when we centralize control flows. only > rdma for now. Should we at some point move the tag_sets themselves to the generic ctrl instead of just pointers? From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: hch@lst.de (Christoph Hellwig) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 14:41:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH rfc 10/30] nvme: Add admin_tagset pointer to nvme_ctrl In-Reply-To: <1497799324-19598-11-git-send-email-sagi@grimberg.me> References: <1497799324-19598-1-git-send-email-sagi@grimberg.me> <1497799324-19598-11-git-send-email-sagi@grimberg.me> Message-ID: <20170619124138.GJ29061@lst.de> On Sun, Jun 18, 2017@06:21:44PM +0300, Sagi Grimberg wrote: > Will be used when we centralize control flows. only > rdma for now. Should we at some point move the tag_sets themselves to the generic ctrl instead of just pointers?