All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: will.deacon@arm.com (Will Deacon)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: Decode information from ESR upon mem faults
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 18:13:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170619171305.GA12786@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1497446043-50944-1-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com>

On Wed, Jun 14, 2017 at 02:14:03PM +0100, Julien Thierry wrote:
> When receiving unhandled faults from the CPU, description is very sparse.
> Adding information about faults decoded from ESR.
> 
> Added defines to esr.h corresponding ESR fields. Values are based on ARM
> Archtecture Reference Manual (DDI 0487B.a), section D7.2.28 ESR_ELx, Exception
> Syndrome Register (ELx) (pages D7-2275 to D7-2280).
> 
> New output is of the form:
> [  122.109118] Mem abort info:
> [  122.111884]   Exception class = DABT (current EL)
> [  122.116564]   IL = 32 bits
> [  122.119242]   SET = 0
> [  122.121507]   FnV = 0
> [  122.123754]   EA = 0
> [  122.125928]   S1PTW = 0
> [  122.128347] Data abort info:
> [  122.131212]   ISS[23:14] invalid

Is it still worth printing the ISS value here? I'm wondering about the
case where an old kernel runs on a new CPU and gets an abort that was
previously undefined.

> [  122.134417]   CM = 0
> [  122.136589]   WnR = 1

Hmm, this might get really confusing if multiple CPUs end up with their
prints interleaved. Perhaps having a print_unhandled_fault_info helper that
takes a prefix string (e.g. "Unhandled fault") and constructs the
information on one line would be preferable?

Then again, you could make the same argument about multi-line register
dumps, so perhaps I'm worrying too much here. Thoughts?

Will

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-19 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-14 13:14 [PATCH] arm64: Decode information from ESR upon mem faults Julien Thierry
2017-06-19 17:13 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2017-06-29  8:58   ` Julien Thierry
2017-07-11 17:57     ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170619171305.GA12786@arm.com \
    --to=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.