From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 12:20:41 +0100 From: Mark Rutland Message-ID: <20170620112040.GE28157@leverpostej> References: <1497018608-22168-1-git-send-email-alex.popov@linux.com> <995f7cdd-9894-5daf-2910-c2aba980302c@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <995f7cdd-9894-5daf-2910-c2aba980302c@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/1] gcc-plugins: Add stackleak feature erasing the kernel stack at the end of syscalls To: Laura Abbott Cc: Kees Cook , Alexander Popov , "kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com" , PaX Team , Brad Spengler , Tycho Andersen , ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org List-ID: On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 02:51:59PM -0700, Laura Abbott wrote: > On 06/09/2017 10:28 AM, Kees Cook wrote: > > It seems like it shouldn't be too hard to add on-user-return erasure > > code to other architectures too. > > I played around getting this to compile for arm64 with a dummy > stack clearing function. arm64 is doing something special with the > efistub so it fails to link with > > drivers/firmware/efi/libstub/arm-stub.c:45:(.init.text+0x54): relocation > truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 against undefined symbol `__efistub_track_stack' > > The relocation to the .init.text section and appending __efistub happens after > compilation so the checks in the plugin itself don't work. I haven't come up > with a solution to not have the plugin run on the stub yet. Can we do something like what we do for KCOV, and (only) place the plugin-invoking flags to into CFLAGS_STACKLEAK, which we can filter out in scripts/Makefile.lib? Thanks, Mark.