From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
To: buildroot@busybox.net
Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] package/imagemagick: change download url to github
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:10:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170620141021.5ecdcd3e@windsurf.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87efueg91o.fsf@dell.be.48ers.dk>
Hello,
On Tue, 20 Jun 2017 14:04:03 +0200, Peter Korsgaard wrote:
> >> > IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION = 7.0.5-10
> >> > -IMAGEMAGICK_SOURCE = ImageMagick-$(IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION).tar.xz
> >> > -IMAGEMAGICK_SITE = http://www.imagemagick.org/download/releases
> >> > +IMAGEMAGICK_SOURCE = $(IMAGEMAGICK_VERSION).tar.gz
> >> > +IMAGEMAGICK_SITE = https://github.com/ImageMagick/ImageMagick/archive
> >>
> >> That SOURCE name is a bit annoying. Is it a big issue that upstream
> >> (re)moves the downloads after some time when we transparently fall back
> >> to getting it from sources.buildroot.org?
>
> > I indeed hadn't seen the stupid name for the tarball. On my side, I
> > find it a bit annoying that we have to rely on sources.b.o to make
> > things work, so having upstream location that are working on the long
> > run is much better when possible. But I agree that the tarball name is
> > really silly here, and the risk of conflict with other packages is real.
>
> That is exactly my concern. So what do we do? Leave it like this so
> s.b.o isn't needed or revert to get back a sane tarball name?
>
> There's pro/cons to both, but I think I would prefer to revert.
Perhaps we could revert *and* talk to the upstream developers and ask
them to keep the tarballs at the same place, instead of (re)moving
them ?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-20 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-18 7:45 [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] package/imagemagick: change download url to github Bernd Kuhls
2017-06-18 7:45 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 2/2] package/imagemagick: bump version to 7.0.6-0 Bernd Kuhls
2017-06-18 13:53 ` [Buildroot] [PATCH 1/2] package/imagemagick: change download url to github Thomas Petazzoni
2017-06-18 19:13 ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-06-19 13:29 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2017-06-20 12:04 ` Peter Korsgaard
2017-06-20 12:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2017-06-20 12:40 ` Peter Korsgaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170620141021.5ecdcd3e@windsurf.lan \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=buildroot@busybox.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.