All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <20170623205118.GA23674@mail.hallyn.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 48784d8..10a1855 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
-Quoting Vivek Goyal (vgoyal at redhat.com):
+Quoting Vivek Goyal (vgoyal@redhat.com):
 > On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 03:17:23PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
-> > Quoting Vivek Goyal (vgoyal at redhat.com):
+> > Quoting Vivek Goyal (vgoyal@redhat.com):
 > > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 02:59:46PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:
 > > > > This series of patches primary goal is to enable file capabilities
 > > > > in user namespaces without affecting the file capabilities that are
@@ -12,16 +12,16 @@ Quoting Vivek Goyal (vgoyal at redhat.com):
 > > > > name when a user namespace is used. If for example the root user
 > > > > in a user namespace writes the security.capability xattr, the name
 > > > > of the xattr that is actually written is encoded as
-> > > > security.capability at uid=1000 for root mapped to uid 1000 on the host.
+> > > > security.capability@uid=1000 for root mapped to uid 1000 on the host.
 > > > > When listing the xattrs on the host, the existing security.capability
-> > > > as well as the security.capability at uid=1000 will be shown. Inside the
+> > > > as well as the security.capability@uid=1000 will be shown. Inside the
 > > > > namespace only 'security.capability', with the value of
-> > > > security.capability at uid=1000, is visible.
+> > > > security.capability@uid=1000, is visible.
 > > > 
 > > > Hi Stefan,
 > > > 
 > > > Got a question. If child usernamespace sets a
-> > > security.capability at uid=1000, can any of the parent namespace remove it?
+> > > security.capability@uid=1000, can any of the parent namespace remove it?
 > > > 
 > > > IOW, I set capability from usernamespace and tried to remove it from
 > > > host and that failed. Is that expected.
@@ -31,21 +31,21 @@ Quoting Vivek Goyal (vgoyal at redhat.com):
 > > > 
 > > > # outside user namespace
 > > > $listxattr foo.txt
-> > >  xattr: security.capability at uid=1000
+> > >  xattr: security.capability@uid=1000
 > > >  xattr: security.selinux
 > > > 
 > > > # outside user namespace
-> > > setfattr -x security.capability at uid foo.txt
+> > > setfattr -x security.capability@uid foo.txt
 > > > setfattr: foo.txt: Invalid argument
 > > > 
 > > > Doing a strace shows removexattr() failed. May this will need fixing?
 > > > 
-> > > removexattr("testfile.txt", "security.capability at uid") = -1 EINVAL
+> > > removexattr("testfile.txt", "security.capability@uid") = -1 EINVAL
 > > > (Invalid argument)
 > > 
 > > That's not the right xattr, though, does
 > > 
-> > 	setfattr -x security.capability at uid=1000 foo.txt
+> > 	setfattr -x security.capability@uid=1000 foo.txt
 > > 
 > > work?
 > 
@@ -60,7 +60,3 @@ Quoting Vivek Goyal (vgoyal at redhat.com):
 D'oh, yes, I was thinking wrongly.  You need *privilege* over the uid, meaning
 CAP_SETFACL against your user_ns and uid 1000 mapped into the user_ns.  So yeah
 just uid 1000 won't suffice.
---
-To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-security-module" in
-the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
-More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index c73a4d8..8c10917 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -2,15 +2,28 @@
  "ref\020170623200956.GB24779@redhat.com\0"
  "ref\020170623201723.GA22857@mail.hallyn.com\0"
  "ref\020170623203643.GC24779@redhat.com\0"
- "From\0serge@hallyn.com (Serge E. Hallyn)\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH 0/3] Enable namespaced file capabilities\0"
+ "From\0Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 0/3] Enable namespaced file capabilities\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 23 Jun 2017 15:51:18 -0500\0"
- "To\0linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org\0"
+ "To\0Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0Serge E. Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com>"
+  Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
+  ebiederm@xmission.com
+  containers@lists.linux-foundation.org
+  lkp@01.org
+  xiaolong.ye@intel.com
+  linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
+  zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
+  tycho@docker.com
+  James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com
+  christian.brauner@mailbox.org
+  amir73il@gmail.com
+ " linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
- "Quoting Vivek Goyal (vgoyal at redhat.com):\n"
+ "Quoting Vivek Goyal (vgoyal@redhat.com):\n"
  "> On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 03:17:23PM -0500, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:\n"
- "> > Quoting Vivek Goyal (vgoyal at redhat.com):\n"
+ "> > Quoting Vivek Goyal (vgoyal@redhat.com):\n"
  "> > > On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 02:59:46PM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote:\n"
  "> > > > This series of patches primary goal is to enable file capabilities\n"
  "> > > > in user namespaces without affecting the file capabilities that are\n"
@@ -22,16 +35,16 @@
  "> > > > name when a user namespace is used. If for example the root user\n"
  "> > > > in a user namespace writes the security.capability xattr, the name\n"
  "> > > > of the xattr that is actually written is encoded as\n"
- "> > > > security.capability at uid=1000 for root mapped to uid 1000 on the host.\n"
+ "> > > > security.capability@uid=1000 for root mapped to uid 1000 on the host.\n"
  "> > > > When listing the xattrs on the host, the existing security.capability\n"
- "> > > > as well as the security.capability at uid=1000 will be shown. Inside the\n"
+ "> > > > as well as the security.capability@uid=1000 will be shown. Inside the\n"
  "> > > > namespace only 'security.capability', with the value of\n"
- "> > > > security.capability at uid=1000, is visible.\n"
+ "> > > > security.capability@uid=1000, is visible.\n"
  "> > > \n"
  "> > > Hi Stefan,\n"
  "> > > \n"
  "> > > Got a question. If child usernamespace sets a\n"
- "> > > security.capability at uid=1000, can any of the parent namespace remove it?\n"
+ "> > > security.capability@uid=1000, can any of the parent namespace remove it?\n"
  "> > > \n"
  "> > > IOW, I set capability from usernamespace and tried to remove it from\n"
  "> > > host and that failed. Is that expected.\n"
@@ -41,21 +54,21 @@
  "> > > \n"
  "> > > # outside user namespace\n"
  "> > > $listxattr foo.txt\n"
- "> > >  xattr: security.capability at uid=1000\n"
+ "> > >  xattr: security.capability@uid=1000\n"
  "> > >  xattr: security.selinux\n"
  "> > > \n"
  "> > > # outside user namespace\n"
- "> > > setfattr -x security.capability at uid foo.txt\n"
+ "> > > setfattr -x security.capability@uid foo.txt\n"
  "> > > setfattr: foo.txt: Invalid argument\n"
  "> > > \n"
  "> > > Doing a strace shows removexattr() failed. May this will need fixing?\n"
  "> > > \n"
- "> > > removexattr(\"testfile.txt\", \"security.capability at uid\") = -1 EINVAL\n"
+ "> > > removexattr(\"testfile.txt\", \"security.capability@uid\") = -1 EINVAL\n"
  "> > > (Invalid argument)\n"
  "> > \n"
  "> > That's not the right xattr, though, does\n"
  "> > \n"
- "> > \tsetfattr -x security.capability at uid=1000 foo.txt\n"
+ "> > \tsetfattr -x security.capability@uid=1000 foo.txt\n"
  "> > \n"
  "> > work?\n"
  "> \n"
@@ -69,10 +82,6 @@
  "\n"
  "D'oh, yes, I was thinking wrongly.  You need *privilege* over the uid, meaning\n"
  "CAP_SETFACL against your user_ns and uid 1000 mapped into the user_ns.  So yeah\n"
- "just uid 1000 won't suffice.\n"
- "--\n"
- "To unsubscribe from this list: send the line \"unsubscribe linux-security-module\" in\n"
- "the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org\n"
- More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
+ just uid 1000 won't suffice.
 
-75eeeb23e77b204bd4caec80bf7aa5910b09ab63946441c7fa9b503fbcb02eee
+c90a4ef3df15dd38066771647fae56b939d30d99d821b83bea35e41e44303a06

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.