From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by lists.gnu.org with archive (Exim 4.71) id 1dOW9K-0003Lo-MM for mharc-grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 17:29:54 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51577) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOW9J-0003Lf-3r for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 17:29:54 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOW9F-0005U1-UE for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 17:29:53 -0400 Received: from mx.mylinuxtime.de ([148.251.109.235]:41138) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dOW9F-0005Ph-Fy for grub-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 17:29:49 -0400 Received: from leda (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:1f0b:a5b:6257:18ff:fe7f:1598]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx.mylinuxtime.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 532312548C; Fri, 23 Jun 2017 23:29:41 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 mx.mylinuxtime.de 532312548C DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=eworm.de; s=mail; t=1498253381; bh=9OHGYlzdFnEH//q+xZo9SOn/R1mXH3HN+6mxSatLtXI=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References; b=Bbbug/RUDm2obFpOOf0CNQQost7nn1Vp0AOJe36Cg2zppQ6wZtmyNgKQJiDwlK/Kb HakN96XNuFLE8Hl1WcwssOUM5AQr7NVNsbhrZzeSbKEDdO5/5T//754Ch+cwGY6s/F NM3AWCLDwIGStO+qhij+wmIWC1319hTWAq26Ue4M= Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 23:29:35 +0200 From: Christian Hesse To: Theodore Ts'o Cc: The development of GNU GRUB , Felipe A Rodriguez , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Possible regression in e2fsprogs-1.43.4 Message-ID: <20170623232935.13fa4688@leda> In-Reply-To: <20170623195318.cfs4ftpmy5nhcccy@thunk.org> References: <20170623195318.cfs4ftpmy5nhcccy@thunk.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.15.0-dirty (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) X-Face: %O:rCSkHSKf7^4uF|FD$9$I0}g$nbnS1{DYPvs#:,~e`).mzj\$P9]V!WCveE/XdbL,L!{)6v%x4\Bt!b#{; dS&h"7l=ow'^({02!2%XOugod|u*mYBVm-OS:VpZ"ZrRA4[Q&zye,^j; ftj!Hxx\1@; LM)Pz)|B%1#sfF; s; ,N?*K*^) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/tJB+jJylythW1WuMesgVeQY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 148.251.109.235 X-BeenThere: grub-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: The development of GNU GRUB List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 21:29:54 -0000 --Sig_/tJB+jJylythW1WuMesgVeQY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Theodore Ts'o on Fri, 2017/06/23 15:53: > +grub-devel >=20 > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 04:00:20PM +0200, Felipe A Rodriguez wrote: > > Upgrading from e2fsprogs-1.42.13 to e2fsprogs-1.43.4 causes the boot > > loader to fail (unknown filesystem error) on the x86_64 VM I use for > > initial testing. I traced the problem to changes in the e2fsprogs > > configuration file which now sets 64 bit flags. I tried upgrading > > to GRUB 2.02 but that did not resolve the problem. Reverting the > > changes per the patch below fixes the problem. =20 >=20 > Hmm, my laptop has been using a file system with the 64-bit feature > enabled for quite some time, and my Debian Stretch system has been > using Grub 2.02 to boot my system without any difficulties. >=20 > I've done a quick check of the Debian patches and none of them seem to > modify Grub's ext2/ext4 file system implementation. So I don't know > what to tell you. Are you sure you properly reinstalled grub on the > boot device after you upgraded to grub 2.02? Grub should be fine, however syslinux still suffers issues with 64-bit feature. Possibly you use a chain to load syslinux first, grub second? --=20 main(a){char*c=3D/* Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH" "CX:;",b;for(a/* Best regards my address: */=3D0;b=3Dc[a+= +];) putchar(b-1/(/* Chris cc -ox -xc - && ./x */b/42*2-3)*42);} --Sig_/tJB+jJylythW1WuMesgVeQY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEXHmveYAHrRp+prOviUUh18yA9HYFAllNiD8ACgkQiUUh18yA 9HZPoQf/fCmuNrhZLkr0V7I7eUzOUlXRrc+KsoQOaTNFOGe9KFPzv0l6BUkLmtig 3BytLkFUTIQLEj0SGpgQjbPKV5Bc5yF+SBV3XAYZyRcMPSbKjLy0JDK56lq1U5dE SbctF/d8PSC082QBjAwyJ+zHGAvlsFLJ5dL/cWQeezRKad3RRPJnO0LP4mHKMYAh BTbpA3UKncuMQiG8d/m1+HyB1lT0PX9eiUwTgSV6C/hL8WhHuuPd2RA+YV3YqiFL ZpJ5k65CCqlP0dz4RmELapZxcJ7OMDgsNK3cjOCYyh9i1ZzLlhtQXZO60lmWk8OU 5c5cGEHUZBQ3isVWLJsuPbVaD4MitQ== =qBQF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/tJB+jJylythW1WuMesgVeQY-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christian Hesse Subject: Re: Possible regression in e2fsprogs-1.43.4 Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 23:29:35 +0200 Message-ID: <20170623232935.13fa4688@leda> References: <20170623195318.cfs4ftpmy5nhcccy@thunk.org> Reply-To: The development of GNU GRUB Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3243122920482670248==" Cc: The development of GNU GRUB , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Felipe A Rodriguez To: Theodore Ts'o Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20170623195318.cfs4ftpmy5nhcccy@thunk.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: grub-devel-bounces+gcbgd-grub-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Grub-devel" List-Id: linux-ext4.vger.kernel.org --===============3243122920482670248== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/tJB+jJylythW1WuMesgVeQY"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --Sig_/tJB+jJylythW1WuMesgVeQY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Theodore Ts'o on Fri, 2017/06/23 15:53: > +grub-devel >=20 > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 04:00:20PM +0200, Felipe A Rodriguez wrote: > > Upgrading from e2fsprogs-1.42.13 to e2fsprogs-1.43.4 causes the boot > > loader to fail (unknown filesystem error) on the x86_64 VM I use for > > initial testing. I traced the problem to changes in the e2fsprogs > > configuration file which now sets 64 bit flags. I tried upgrading > > to GRUB 2.02 but that did not resolve the problem. Reverting the > > changes per the patch below fixes the problem. =20 >=20 > Hmm, my laptop has been using a file system with the 64-bit feature > enabled for quite some time, and my Debian Stretch system has been > using Grub 2.02 to boot my system without any difficulties. >=20 > I've done a quick check of the Debian patches and none of them seem to > modify Grub's ext2/ext4 file system implementation. So I don't know > what to tell you. Are you sure you properly reinstalled grub on the > boot device after you upgraded to grub 2.02? Grub should be fine, however syslinux still suffers issues with 64-bit feature. Possibly you use a chain to load syslinux first, grub second? --=20 main(a){char*c=3D/* Schoene Gruesse */"B?IJj;MEH" "CX:;",b;for(a/* Best regards my address: */=3D0;b=3Dc[a+= +];) putchar(b-1/(/* Chris cc -ox -xc - && ./x */b/42*2-3)*42);} --Sig_/tJB+jJylythW1WuMesgVeQY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEXHmveYAHrRp+prOviUUh18yA9HYFAllNiD8ACgkQiUUh18yA 9HZPoQf/fCmuNrhZLkr0V7I7eUzOUlXRrc+KsoQOaTNFOGe9KFPzv0l6BUkLmtig 3BytLkFUTIQLEj0SGpgQjbPKV5Bc5yF+SBV3XAYZyRcMPSbKjLy0JDK56lq1U5dE SbctF/d8PSC082QBjAwyJ+zHGAvlsFLJ5dL/cWQeezRKad3RRPJnO0LP4mHKMYAh BTbpA3UKncuMQiG8d/m1+HyB1lT0PX9eiUwTgSV6C/hL8WhHuuPd2RA+YV3YqiFL ZpJ5k65CCqlP0dz4RmELapZxcJ7OMDgsNK3cjOCYyh9i1ZzLlhtQXZO60lmWk8OU 5c5cGEHUZBQ3isVWLJsuPbVaD4MitQ== =qBQF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/tJB+jJylythW1WuMesgVeQY-- --===============3243122920482670248== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel --===============3243122920482670248==--