From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46272) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQ6vO-000231-TB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 02:58:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQ6vL-0002BZ-T4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 02:58:07 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35626) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQ6vL-0002A6-NS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 02:58:03 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0A0D3DBDD for ; Wed, 28 Jun 2017 06:58:02 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 14:57:58 +0800 From: Peter Xu Message-ID: <20170628065758.GG14652@pxdev.xzpeter.org> References: <1498536619-14548-1-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> <1498536619-14548-2-git-send-email-peterx@redhat.com> <20170627145507.GY12152@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 01/10] machine: export register_compat_prop() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: Eduardo Habkost , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Laurent Vivier , Markus Armbruster , Juan Quintela , "Dr . David Alan Gilbert" On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 10:05:54AM -0500, Eric Blake wrote: > On 06/27/2017 09:55 AM, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > >> + * > >> + * The property values set using this function must be always valid and > >> + * never report setter errors, as they property have > > > > Typo (my fault, sorry). It should be "the property have", or "the > > property will have". > > > > "the property will have" Thanks Eduardo & Eric for reviewing. I suppose this series will go through Juan's tree if finally proper? Anyway, please anyone let me know if we need a repost. > > > With this fixed (which may be done manually by the maintainer when > > applying): > > > > Reviewed-by: Eduardo Habkost -- Peter Xu