diff for duplicates of <20170628112601.GD5981@leverpostej> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index 55ae8ed..c068179 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -148,8 +148,8 @@ That's worrying. I'll see if I can reproduce this. > > > the second SPE node from fvp-base.dts and add it to my working device > > > tree, I get this during the driver probe: > > > -> > > [ 1.042063] arm_spe_pmu spe-pmu at 0: probed for CPUs 0-7 [max_record_sz 64, align 1, features 0xf] -> > > [ 1.043582] arm_spe_pmu spe-pmu at 1: probed for CPUs 0-7 [max_record_sz 64, align 1, features 0xf] +> > > [ 1.042063] arm_spe_pmu spe-pmu@0: probed for CPUs 0-7 [max_record_sz 64, align 1, features 0xf] +> > > [ 1.043582] arm_spe_pmu spe-pmu@1: probed for CPUs 0-7 [max_record_sz 64, align 1, features 0xf] > > > [ 1.043631] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 6. 00004404 (arm_spe_pmu) vs. 00004404 (arm_spe_pmu) > > > > Looks like you've screwed up your IRQ partitions, so you are effectively @@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ by the user. > I can't tell which part of the fvp-base device tree is not liked by the > firmware; I tried different combinations of the PSCI node, different CPU -> enumerations (cpu at 100 vs cpu at 1), removing idle-states properties...any +> enumerations (cpu@100 vs cpu@1), removing idle-states properties...any > hints appreciated. The bootwrapper doesn't support idle. So no idle-states should be in the diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index dc91dcd..a845978 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -6,10 +6,22 @@ "ref\020170622105640.c444b8b0f16266ba2c3ce304@arm.com\0" "ref\020170622183620.GJ15336@arm.com\0" "ref\020170627160758.cdaebc3e7f0cd88455e07763@arm.com\0" - "From\0mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)\0" - "Subject\0[PATCH v4 0/5] Add support for the ARMv8.2 Statistical Profiling Extension\0" + "From\0Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>\0" + "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] Add support for the ARMv8.2 Statistical Profiling Extension\0" "Date\0Wed, 28 Jun 2017 12:26:02 +0100\0" - "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" + "To\0Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@arm.com>\0" + "Cc\0Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>" + linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org + marc.zyngier@arm.com + tglx@linutronix.de + peterz@infradead.org + alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com + robh@kernel.org + suzuki.poulose@arm.com + pawel.moll@arm.com + mathieu.poirier@linaro.org + mingo@redhat.com + " linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 04:07:58PM -0500, Kim Phillips wrote:\n" @@ -162,8 +174,8 @@ "> > > the second SPE node from fvp-base.dts and add it to my working device\n" "> > > tree, I get this during the driver probe:\n" "> > > \n" - "> > > [ 1.042063] arm_spe_pmu spe-pmu at 0: probed for CPUs 0-7 [max_record_sz 64, align 1, features 0xf]\n" - "> > > [ 1.043582] arm_spe_pmu spe-pmu at 1: probed for CPUs 0-7 [max_record_sz 64, align 1, features 0xf]\n" + "> > > [ 1.042063] arm_spe_pmu spe-pmu@0: probed for CPUs 0-7 [max_record_sz 64, align 1, features 0xf]\n" + "> > > [ 1.043582] arm_spe_pmu spe-pmu@1: probed for CPUs 0-7 [max_record_sz 64, align 1, features 0xf]\n" "> > > [ 1.043631] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 6. 00004404 (arm_spe_pmu) vs. 00004404 (arm_spe_pmu)\n" "> > \n" "> > Looks like you've screwed up your IRQ partitions, so you are effectively\n" @@ -213,7 +225,7 @@ "\n" "> I can't tell which part of the fvp-base device tree is not liked by the\n" "> firmware; I tried different combinations of the PSCI node, different CPU\n" - "> enumerations (cpu at 100 vs cpu at 1), removing idle-states properties...any\n" + "> enumerations (cpu@100 vs cpu@1), removing idle-states properties...any\n" "> hints appreciated.\n" "\n" "The bootwrapper doesn't support idle. So no idle-states should be in the\n" @@ -225,4 +237,4 @@ "Thanks,\n" Mark. -360b1d365618d058370541854ea3aae4400dbe46ca70abe3f897f2421680ccb5 +a88bb0889b94aa85d80abf957c760df0ccbffd04bffe88c7dce859f366d31150
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.