From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the injected #PF is async_pf
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2017 15:38:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170628133852.GA3261@potion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <293c4524-5869-2d3f-e0a3-92bde4430b81@redhat.com>
2017-06-28 14:56+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 28/06/2017 14:25, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> From: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
>>
>> Add an nested_apf field to vcpu->arch.exception to identify an async page
>> fault, and constructs the expected vm-exit information fields. Force a
>> nested VM exit from nested_vmx_check_exception() if the injected #PF is
>> async page fault. Extending the userspace interface KVM_GET_VCPU_EVENTS
>> and KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS for live migration.
>>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com>
>> ---
>
> Radim, Wanpeng,
>
> the patch is nice now but I'm still not 100% sure about the live
> migration part. Why do we need to pass nested_apf to userspace, but not
> nested_apf_token?
We do not need it for migration, but unavailable nested_apf_token
already breaks checkpoint & restore from userspace ... I think the
cleanest way would be to add a new paravirtual event for nested_apf.
(Or just keep delaying the apf.)
Migration does a "async-pf-broadcast" while setting the async-pf MSR on
destination, which resumes all async-pf waiters.
Userspace actually has to drop the async-pf event on migration, because
the destination has invalid nested_apf_token. (It's a horrible design.)
nested_apf is not #PF: if we didn't pass nested_apf, then the exception
would be injected as #PF to L2 after migration. (Local KVM could
remember that the #PF is nested_apf and do some ugly hacks.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-28 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-28 12:25 [PATCH v6 0/4] KVM: async_pf: Fix async pf exception injection Wanpeng Li
2017-06-28 12:25 ` [PATCH v6 1/4] KVM: x86: Simple kvm_x86_ops->queue_exception parameter Wanpeng Li
2017-06-28 12:25 ` [PATCH v6 2/4] KVM: async_pf: Add L1 guest async_pf #PF vmexit handler Wanpeng Li
2017-06-28 12:25 ` [PATCH v6 3/4] KVM: async_pf: Force a nested vmexit if the injected #PF is async_pf Wanpeng Li
2017-06-28 12:56 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-28 13:38 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2017-06-28 13:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-28 14:09 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-06-28 14:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-28 14:17 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-06-28 14:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-06-28 14:23 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-06-28 12:25 ` [PATCH v6 4/4] KVM: async_pf: Let host know whether the guest support delivery async_pf as #PF vmexit Wanpeng Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170628133852.GA3261@potion \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.