From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:32970) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQhKd-000470-3n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:50:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQhKa-0005yh-2j for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:50:35 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:60077) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dQhKZ-0005wv-M7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:50:31 -0400 Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2017 17:50:28 -0400 From: "Emilio G. Cota" Message-ID: <20170629215028.GA9797@flamenco> References: <149838022308.6497.2104916050645246693.stgit@frigg.lan> <149838167780.6497.10644158789800844637.stgit@frigg.lan> <20170626181451.GH17935@flamenco> <87vangcq5g.fsf@frigg.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <87vangcq5g.fsf@frigg.lan> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 06/26] target: [tcg, i386] Port to DisasContextBase List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Paolo Bonzini , Peter Crosthwaite , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , Eduardo Habkost , Richard Henderson On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 14:23:07 +0300, Lluís Vilanova wrote: > Emilio G Cota writes: > > > On Sun, Jun 25, 2017 at 12:07:57 +0300, Lluís Vilanova wrote: > >> Incrementally paves the way towards using the generic instruction translation > >> loop. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Lluís Vilanova > > > Just a minor nit: the commit titles are a little strange to me. > > I'd rather do: "target/arch: foo" than "target: [tcg, arch]: foo" -- > > it's less characters ("tcg" is redundant) and seems more in line with > > qemu's idioms. > > Is tcg redundant? I thought it was necessary for differentiating it from the kvm > target-specific parts. In most cases it is redundant -- anyway my point is that "targer/foo" will be enough to get the right eyes on the patch. Cheers, E.