All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
To: josef@toxicpanda.com
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, riel@redhat.com,
	Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4][v2] vmscan: bailout of slab reclaim once we reach our target
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 13:27:04 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170705042704.GA20079@bbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499171620-6746-2-git-send-email-jbacik@fb.com>

On Tue, Jul 04, 2017 at 08:33:38AM -0400, josef@toxicpanda.com wrote:
> From: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
> 
> Following patches will greatly increase our aggressiveness in slab
> reclaim, so we need checks in place to make sure we stop trying to
> reclaim slab once we've hit our reclaim target.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> - Don't bail out in shrink_slab() so that we always scan at least batch_size
>   objects of every slab regardless of wether we've hit our target or not.

It's no different with v1 for aging fairness POV.

Imagine you have 3 shrinkers in shrinker_list and A has a lots of objects.

        HEAD-> A -> B -> C

shrink_slab does scan/reclaims from A srhinker a lot until it meets
sc->nr_to_reclaim. Then, VM does aging B and C with batch_size which is
rather small. It breaks fairness.

In next memory pressure, it shrinks A a lot again but B and C
a little bit.

> 
>  mm/vmscan.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index cf23de9..78860a6 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -305,11 +305,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_shrinker);
>  
>  #define SHRINK_BATCH 128
>  
> -static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
> +static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct scan_control *sc,
> +				    struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
>  				    struct shrinker *shrinker,
>  				    unsigned long nr_scanned,
>  				    unsigned long nr_eligible)
>  {
> +	struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
>  	unsigned long freed = 0;
>  	unsigned long long delta;
>  	long total_scan;
> @@ -394,14 +396,18 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
>  
>  		shrinkctl->nr_to_scan = nr_to_scan;
>  		ret = shrinker->scan_objects(shrinker, shrinkctl);
> +		if (reclaim_state) {
> +			sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
> +			reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0;
> +		}
>  		if (ret == SHRINK_STOP)
>  			break;
>  		freed += ret;
> -
>  		count_vm_events(SLABS_SCANNED, nr_to_scan);
>  		total_scan -= nr_to_scan;
>  		scanned += nr_to_scan;
> -
> +		if (sc->nr_reclaimed >= sc->nr_to_reclaim)
> +			break;
>  		cond_resched();
>  	}
>  
> @@ -452,7 +458,7 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
>   *
>   * Returns the number of reclaimed slab objects.
>   */
> -static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> +static unsigned long shrink_slab(struct scan_control *sc, int nid,
>  				 struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>  				 unsigned long nr_scanned,
>  				 unsigned long nr_eligible)
> @@ -478,8 +484,8 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
>  	}
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) {
> -		struct shrink_control sc = {
> -			.gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
> +		struct shrink_control shrinkctl = {
> +			.gfp_mask = sc->gfp_mask,
>  			.nid = nid,
>  			.memcg = memcg,
>  		};
> @@ -494,9 +500,10 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
>  			continue;
>  
>  		if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE))
> -			sc.nid = 0;
> +			shrinkctl.nid = 0;
>  
> -		freed += do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, nr_scanned, nr_eligible);
> +		freed += do_shrink_slab(sc, &shrinkctl, shrinker, nr_scanned,
> +					nr_eligible);
>  	}
>  
>  	up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
> @@ -510,11 +517,15 @@ void drop_slab_node(int nid)
>  	unsigned long freed;
>  
>  	do {
> +		struct scan_control sc = {
> +			.nr_to_reclaim = -1UL,
> +			.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL,
> +		};
>  		struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
>  
>  		freed = 0;
>  		do {
> -			freed += shrink_slab(GFP_KERNEL, nid, memcg,
> +			freed += shrink_slab(&sc, nid, memcg,
>  					     1000, 1000);
>  		} while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)) != NULL);
>  	} while (freed > 10);
> @@ -2600,7 +2611,7 @@ static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
>  			node_lru_pages += lru_pages;
>  
>  			if (memcg)
> -				shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id,
> +				shrink_slab(sc, pgdat->node_id,
>  					    memcg, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
>  					    lru_pages);
>  
> @@ -2631,7 +2642,7 @@ static bool shrink_node(pg_data_t *pgdat, struct scan_control *sc)
>  		 * the eligible LRU pages were scanned.
>  		 */
>  		if (global_reclaim(sc))
> -			shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, pgdat->node_id, NULL,
> +			shrink_slab(sc, pgdat->node_id, NULL,
>  				    sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
>  				    node_lru_pages);
>  
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-05  4:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-04 12:33 [PATCH 1/4] vmscan: push reclaim_state down to shrink_node() josef
2017-07-04 12:33 ` [PATCH 2/4][v2] vmscan: bailout of slab reclaim once we reach our target josef
2017-07-05  4:27   ` Minchan Kim [this message]
2017-07-05 12:57     ` Josef Bacik
2017-07-04 12:33 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm: use slab size in the slab shrinking ratio calculation josef
2017-07-04 12:33 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm: make kswapd try harder to keep active pages in cache josef

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170705042704.GA20079@bbox \
    --to=minchan@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=jbacik@fb.com \
    --cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.