All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Arun Kalyanasundaram <arunkaly@google.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	David Carrillo-Cisneros <davidcc@google.com>
Subject: Re: perf script: Question: Python trace processing script contains the tid of the process in the common_pid attribute
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 16:25:45 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170705192545.GI27350@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGjB_BryYM7sY-LqBzN=+54ae6ox60kjH3L9KXu-oBfZ1CPQVQ@mail.gmail.com>

Em Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 09:22:07AM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram escreveu:
> Hi Arnaldo,
> 
> Thank you for your reply.
> I actually meant tracepoint event handlers: def
> trace_unhandled(event_name, context, event_fields_dict)
> The dict parameter contains an attribute "common_pid" which is
> actually the "tid" of the thread. There are no other attributes that
> contain the actual pid of the process. So, I was wondering if this is
> something intentional? If not I can share a patch to fix this.

Yeah there is a problem in:

tools/perf/util/scripting-engines/trace-event-python.c

static void python_process_event(union perf_event *event,
                                 struct perf_sample *sample,
                                 struct perf_evsel *evsel,
                                 struct addr_location *al)
{
        struct tables *tables = &tables_global;

        switch (evsel->attr.type) {
        case PERF_TYPE_TRACEPOINT:
                python_process_tracepoint(sample, evsel, al);
                break;
        /* Reserve for future process_hw/sw/raw APIs */
        default:
                if (tables->db_export_mode)
                        db_export__sample(&tables->dbe, event, sample, evsel, al);
                else
                        python_process_general_event(sample, evsel, al);
        }
}

The python_process_tracepoint() thing predates
python_process_general_event(), and doesn't adds the dict with all the
perf_sample entries that python_process_general_event() passes to the
python method :-\

Both the per-tracepoint python hooks _and_ trace_unhandled() should get
that dict, is that what your patch does?

- Arnaldo
 
> Best,
> - Arun
> 
> 
> On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
> <acme@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Em Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 03:40:57PM -0700, Arun Kalyanasundaram escreveu:
> >> The handlers in the python script generated from "perf script" have an
> >> attribute: common_pid. This attribute contains the tid of the process
> >> instead of its pid. I would like to know if this is the expected behavior.
> >> There are no other attributes in the Python handler that provide the pid
> >> and knowing the process id is useful to be able to group all samples that
> >> belong to the same process that generated different threads.
> >
> > Humm, you have:
> >
> > def process_event(param_dict):
> >         event_attr = param_dict["attr"]
> >         sample     = param_dict["sample"]
> >         raw_buf    = param_dict["raw_buf"]
> >         comm       = param_dict["comm"]
> >         name       = param_dict["ev_name"]
> >
> > And then, on sample you have (from a recent python script for processing
> > Intel PT samples):
> >
> > def print_common_start(comm, sample, name):
> >        ts = sample["time"]
> >        cpu = sample["cpu"]
> >        pid = sample["pid"]
> >        tid = sample["tid"]
> >        print "%16s %5u/%-5u [%03u] %9u.%09u %7s:" % (comm, pid, tid, cpu, ts / 1000000000, ts %1000000000, name),
> >
> > - Arnaldo

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-05 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAGjB_Bp0haKX+YPC5117yK440mTK1ZW3WBubt616hbKaQNxd6w@mail.gmail.com>
2017-07-01 14:47 ` perf script: Question: Python trace processing script contains the tid of the process in the common_pid attribute Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-05 16:22   ` Arun Kalyanasundaram
2017-07-05 19:25     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2017-07-05 19:26       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-07-05 20:41         ` Arun Kalyanasundaram
2017-07-05 23:51           ` Arun Kalyanasundaram
2017-07-07 15:18             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170705192545.GI27350@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=arunkaly@google.com \
    --cc=davidcc@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tzanussi@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.