From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@intellique.com>
Cc: "'linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Weird xfs_repair error
Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2017 09:48:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170706134801.GA56732@bfoster.bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170706153020.0ad6dd47@harpe.intellique.com>
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 03:30:20PM +0200, Emmanuel Florac wrote:
>
> After a RAID controller went bananas, I encountered an XFS corruption
> on a filesystem. Weirdly, the corruption seems to be mostly located in
> lost+found.
>
> (I'm currently working on a metadump'd image of course, not the real
> thing; there are 90TB of data to be hopefully salvaged in there).
>
> "ls /mnt/rescue/lost+found" gave this:
>
> XFS (loop0): metadata I/O error: block 0x22b03f490
> ("xfs_trans_read_buf_map") error 117 numblks 16
> XFS (loop0): xfs_imap_to_bp: xfs_trans_read_buf() returned error 117.
> XFS (loop0): Corruption detected. Unmount and run xfs_repair
> XFS (loop0): Corruption detected. Unmount and run xfs_repair
>
> I've run xfs_repair 4.9 on the xfs_mdrestored image. It dumps an insane
> lot of errors (the output log is 65MB) and ends with this very strange
> message:
>
> disconnected inode 26417467, moving to lost+found
> disconnected inode 26417468, moving to lost+found
> disconnected inode 26417469, moving to lost+found
> disconnected inode 26417470, moving to lost+found
>
> fatal error -- name create failed in lost+found (117), filesystem may
> be out of space
>
> Even stranger, after mounting back the image, there is no lost+found
> anywhere to be found! However the filesystem has lots of free space and
> free inodes, how come?
>
Did you originally run xfs_repair using the -n option? I'd guess not if
it ultimately failed making a modification, but if so, something to be
aware of is that it skips warning about a dirty log and potentially can
report much more corruption than after a log recovery occurs. It might
be worth running after an attempted log recovery.
Otherwise, I'd be curious about the state of the fs after the above
error. Does 'xfs_repair -n' continue to report errors?
Also the above suggests that lost+found existed (in a corrupted state)
prior to the initial repair attempt, yes? If so, it might be interesting
to identify the inode # of lost+found to follow what xfs_repair does to
that inode during the initial run (e.g., if lost+found is corrupted and
is attempted to be used before it is fixed up or something of that
nature).
Brian
> df -i
> Sys. fich. Inodes IUtil. ILibre IUti% Monté sur
> rootfs 0 0 0 - /
> /dev/root 0 0 0 - /
> tmpfs 2058692 990 2057702 1% /run
> tmpfs 2058692 6 2058686 1% /run/lock
> tmpfs 2058692 1623 2057069 1% /dev
> tmpfs 2058692 3 2058689 1% /run/shm
> guitare:/mnt/raid/partage 33554432 305069 33249363 1% /mnt/qnap1
> /dev/loop0 4914413568 5199932 4909213636 1% /mnt/rescue
>
> df
> /dev/loop0 122858252288 88827890868 34030361420 73% /mnt/rescue
>
> I'll give a shot to a newer version of xfs_repair just in case...
>
> --
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
> | Intellique
> | <eflorac@intellique.com>
> | +33 1 78 94 84 02
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-06 13:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-06 13:30 Weird xfs_repair error Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-06 13:48 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2017-07-06 14:49 ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-06 23:28 ` Dave Chinner
2017-07-07 11:36 ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-07 11:50 ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-07 15:36 ` Darrick J. Wong
2017-07-10 17:29 ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-11 13:23 ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-17 17:11 ` Brian Foster
2017-07-24 14:27 ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-24 14:51 ` Brian Foster
2017-07-25 16:44 ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-25 17:16 ` Emmanuel Florac
2017-07-25 19:22 ` Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170706134801.GA56732@bfoster.bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=eflorac@intellique.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.